Truzi
Member
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2012
- Messages
- 2,652
- Format
- Multi Format
How do you deal with your color negatives? I've found answers to most of my questions on APUG, but there are a few details I could not find. Earlier this year I developed my first batch of color film; about 18 rolls. Most came out better than I expected for a first attempt. All of the rolls were intended as tests, so I did not risk any important photos. I used a Tetenal liquid kit, but separate bleach and fix from a Digibase kit.
QUESTIONS
0) Drying marks
I have improved greatly with this, and have few problems unrelated to laziness. In other words, if I don't rush myself, I am fine. I can still find issues if I zoom-in greater than I would ever print, but it is now a non-issue for practical purposes. I will still try to improve by using PE's suggestion of a stabilizer-wetted sponge wipe before drying. I tried a squeegee once... won't do that again.
1) Dust
I seemed to have dried my film with no major dust issues. Scanning, extrapolated to enlarging, is a different story. At least with enlarging I will have fewer surfaces to worry about (glassless carriers).
When I get to enlarging, it will be in a bathroom; I can run the shower first to help with dust and static.
Gently wiping with PEC pads and blowing the negatives with a generic can of air ("keyboard cleaner") seems to have helped. I think I have this under control, but would appreciate input. Any comments on anti-static brushes?
Also, I assume I should dust the negative strips before re-inserting into a Print File page.
2) Curling negatives
They had hung for two days, so were definitely dry before any flattening attempts.
After my first scanning attempted, I put the negatives in Print File pages, put the stack of pages between a couple hard-cover books, and then piled books, projectors, etc. on them. This helped greatly.
However, I have a few strange artifacts. Looking closely with the naked eye, the negatives seem to have some "pillowing." I can't describe it well, but if you put a plastic bag on the floor you can notice some areas are not perfectly flat. It is a bit like that when it occurs, and within the frames.
This did not affect scanning, and hopefully won't affect traditional enlarging. My guess is that stacking the pages did this.
Should I put only one page between each set of hard surfaces, or do I need to flatten in a different manner altogether?
3) Oily fingerprints
Yes, I know... gloves. I find it hard to pull the negatives from the Print File pages with my bare fingers. Any tips in general? Any suggestions on what gloves to buy?
4) Cleaning negatives
I've seen PEC-12 suggested to clean fingerprints et. Al., and have read claims it is archival and safe for color and B&W.
Should I re-stabilize if I clean a color negative with PEC-12 or any other fluid?
Tangentially related:
5) Cross-over
Is cross-over archival? In other words, if I mess up developing and get some cross-over, does it affect longevity/stability of the negatives? My guess is no, so long as I bleach, fix, and stabilize correctly, but why not ask?
6) Color balance
I have an Expodisc, viewing filters, and a Jobo Colorstar, none of which I've yet used (I forget what model Colorstar, as it's packed away - I believe it's a 3000). I am also considering a gray card. Should this be sufficient for snapshots? I understand Colorstar calibration may be a steep learning curve (and that some consider these units unnecessary).
I can see the color casts, but can't quite correct one cast without creating another - at least not easily (plus, I'm not sure if this is in the film, or from my scanning).
Ultimately I will be all analog - please tell me color balance in wet printing is easier than digital.
Background:
I just take snapshots. The culling of local mini-labs, and reduced quality in remaining ones, were the impetus for me joining APUG in the first place. (Interestingly, this has renewed my interest in B&W.)
My original goal was/is to get prints that at least equal average drugstore mini-lab prints circa 2005. Perhaps someday I will aspire to the quality some people on APUG consider second-nature, but that would be a bonus.
I don't want to mail my film out, and the only remaining local pro-shop pissed me off, losing my patronage, even though the quality was very good.
Thanx to APUG, I feel confident developing "important" rolls myself from this point. Although I need improvement, my results are close enough to the local mini-labs for my purposes.
QUESTIONS
0) Drying marks
I have improved greatly with this, and have few problems unrelated to laziness. In other words, if I don't rush myself, I am fine. I can still find issues if I zoom-in greater than I would ever print, but it is now a non-issue for practical purposes. I will still try to improve by using PE's suggestion of a stabilizer-wetted sponge wipe before drying. I tried a squeegee once... won't do that again.
1) Dust
I seemed to have dried my film with no major dust issues. Scanning, extrapolated to enlarging, is a different story. At least with enlarging I will have fewer surfaces to worry about (glassless carriers).
When I get to enlarging, it will be in a bathroom; I can run the shower first to help with dust and static.
Gently wiping with PEC pads and blowing the negatives with a generic can of air ("keyboard cleaner") seems to have helped. I think I have this under control, but would appreciate input. Any comments on anti-static brushes?
Also, I assume I should dust the negative strips before re-inserting into a Print File page.
2) Curling negatives
They had hung for two days, so were definitely dry before any flattening attempts.
After my first scanning attempted, I put the negatives in Print File pages, put the stack of pages between a couple hard-cover books, and then piled books, projectors, etc. on them. This helped greatly.
However, I have a few strange artifacts. Looking closely with the naked eye, the negatives seem to have some "pillowing." I can't describe it well, but if you put a plastic bag on the floor you can notice some areas are not perfectly flat. It is a bit like that when it occurs, and within the frames.
This did not affect scanning, and hopefully won't affect traditional enlarging. My guess is that stacking the pages did this.
Should I put only one page between each set of hard surfaces, or do I need to flatten in a different manner altogether?
3) Oily fingerprints
Yes, I know... gloves. I find it hard to pull the negatives from the Print File pages with my bare fingers. Any tips in general? Any suggestions on what gloves to buy?
4) Cleaning negatives
I've seen PEC-12 suggested to clean fingerprints et. Al., and have read claims it is archival and safe for color and B&W.
Should I re-stabilize if I clean a color negative with PEC-12 or any other fluid?
Tangentially related:
5) Cross-over
Is cross-over archival? In other words, if I mess up developing and get some cross-over, does it affect longevity/stability of the negatives? My guess is no, so long as I bleach, fix, and stabilize correctly, but why not ask?
6) Color balance
I have an Expodisc, viewing filters, and a Jobo Colorstar, none of which I've yet used (I forget what model Colorstar, as it's packed away - I believe it's a 3000). I am also considering a gray card. Should this be sufficient for snapshots? I understand Colorstar calibration may be a steep learning curve (and that some consider these units unnecessary).
I can see the color casts, but can't quite correct one cast without creating another - at least not easily (plus, I'm not sure if this is in the film, or from my scanning).
Ultimately I will be all analog - please tell me color balance in wet printing is easier than digital.
Background:
I just take snapshots. The culling of local mini-labs, and reduced quality in remaining ones, were the impetus for me joining APUG in the first place. (Interestingly, this has renewed my interest in B&W.)
My original goal was/is to get prints that at least equal average drugstore mini-lab prints circa 2005. Perhaps someday I will aspire to the quality some people on APUG consider second-nature, but that would be a bonus.
I don't want to mail my film out, and the only remaining local pro-shop pissed me off, losing my patronage, even though the quality was very good.
Thanx to APUG, I feel confident developing "important" rolls myself from this point. Although I need improvement, my results are close enough to the local mini-labs for my purposes.