Graflex back as useful as Graflok?

Tyndall Bruce

A
Tyndall Bruce

  • 0
  • 0
  • 20
TEXTURES

A
TEXTURES

  • 4
  • 0
  • 44
Small Craft Club

A
Small Craft Club

  • 2
  • 0
  • 45
RED FILTER

A
RED FILTER

  • 1
  • 0
  • 36
The Small Craft Club

A
The Small Craft Club

  • 3
  • 0
  • 42

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,902
Messages
2,782,755
Members
99,741
Latest member
likes_life
Recent bookmarks
2

MMfoto

Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2004
Messages
425
Format
Super8
Hi, I'm looking into purchasing a Graflex RB Super D. The Graflok models go for quite a bit more, and I'm wondering if there is really a major downside to sticking with a Graflex back, and maybe using a bag mag?

Thanks!
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,533
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
I suppose if you don't mind being quite severely limited it might work out okay. Graflok, though, allows the greatest flexability... including the ability to use "normal" film holders. For most people that capability is considered a basic necessity.
 

jamie young

Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2006
Messages
421
Location
Syracuse, NY
Format
Multi Format
It's just a matter of finding the right holders and backs on the auction site, or anywhere else you can. I've been using the graflex backs and bag mags without too much hassle. works ok for me.
 

Mike Wilde

Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2006
Messages
2,903
Location
Misissauaga
Format
Multi Format
I'll inquire-

I borrowed a 4x5 camera from a friend, and unwittingly pulled a number of graflex holders, in addition to graflock holders off his shelf. I now am wise to the two incompatible systems from the same company - ah, I love innovation.

Jim seemeds to have about 40 graflex holders, and I am not sure if he even still has a camera that uses them. If you are interested, I can ask him if he is in the mood to sell any, and get you in touch.
 

Len Robertson

Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2005
Messages
154
Format
Large Format
As far as I know there isn't a Polaroid holder for a Graflex back, and I haven't heard of anyone hacking a Polaroid to fit (although it may be possible). I don't follow Super D prices, but I have a feeling one with a Graflok is a lot more expensive ($200-300 more?), and they are much, much more difficult to find. Converting a Graflex back to a Graflok on a Super D isn't a do-it-yourself job, either. I suspect a milling machine is involved, and the skill to run it. So if you must use Polaroid, you need a Graflok (I actually hope someone will tell me I'm mistaken). This post has more details: http://graflex.org/helpboard/viewtopic.php?=&p=26084

If you can live with 4X5 sheet film, Graflex holders and bag-mags work fine, although it will take a bit of searching to find some. You may get lucky and find a Super D that includes some holders. There are Graflex roll holders and even Grafmatics, but these are pretty rare.
 

k_jupiter

Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2004
Messages
2,569
Location
san jose, ca
Format
Multi Format
The Graflok back allows that most sublime of all human inventions--the Grafmatic. Beats the bag by a mile.

There were Grafmatics made for Graflex backs also. Rare as hens teeth but they do exist.

tim in san jose
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom