Got Lucky?

Amund · Feb 10, 2006

Here`s why I`ll never buy any cheap film anymore.
You just don`t know what you`ll get...
And no, I don`t have a dust problem

Fotohuis · Feb 10, 2006

Lucky is crap, but now you know it by testing it yourself.

Best regards,

Robert

Amund · Feb 11, 2006

And here a similar scene, shot with TXP a couple of minutes earlier. This is the full image, the Lucky 100 example was a crop. The TXP is perfect.
I`m now officially out of the "film of the month" club. I`ll use Tri-X as long as I can get it...

fschifano · Feb 11, 2006

No argument there Blix. I use cheap film for fun. Not knowing if you've got a bad roll or not knowing exactly how this batch is going to work keeps things a little more interesting. If I'm out to make images that I'd like to turn into keepers, well, that's another story. Then I go straight to the Kodak or Ilford products. I know they'll be good and any screw up will be my fault.

abeku · Feb 11, 2006

Hi Blix,
That looks terrible! How did you process the film?! I've been shooting 20-30 Lucky films without having any real issues. As a matter of fact, it's the prime toycam film for me. Stand development in Rodinal always gives me crisp negatives.
PS Dump the film on me! DS

Amund · Feb 11, 2006

It was semi-stand developed in pyrocat HD. Luckily(pun intended) it was my last roll

Got Lucky?

Amund

Fotohuis

Amund

fschifano

abeku

Amund

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency