Anything is possible, cheapest WLF would likely come from a Kiev 80. I have seen a Yashica Mat fitted with one, so Rollei is in same size area. I was going to comment on your choice, but all I will say is that a TLR with a prism is no longer a TLR, just plain weird in looks and operation, no to mention the rather light WLF version gets killed by the monster prism on top.So I traded my gargantuan Fuji GX680 for a Rolleiflex 2.8 E with a prism finder. The Fuji is amazing, but I'm a walk-arounder more than I'm a tripod setter-upper... There's a chip about 2mm in diameter on the front element of the taking lens, but I really don't think that'll be a problem.
BUT
I got it with the prism instead of a WLF (I'd like to be able to use both) thinking that the WLF would be cheaper. Which turns out not to be true....
How easy or hard is it to adapt a Hasselblad or other manufacturer's WLF? I see that people do it, I just don't know what's involved. The camera is strictly a shooter - I don't care if it looks weird.
Also, it came with a leather strap complete with the alligator clips (yay!) but the the leather is showing its age. Have any of you adapted the clips to a nylon strap? As much as I like the leather, I had a Nikkormat go swimming once when the strap just gave up... Synthetics have their place...
Thanks!
To each their owna TLR with a prism is no longer a TLR, just plain weird in looks and operation, no to mention the rather light WLF version gets killed by the monster prism on top.
Matt, it's a monster TLR to begin with, so prism pales on top of it. I have a prism for Rolleiflex and never used it outside of its case. Sure, we are all different ... and in dire need to collect whatever was made for a camera we own. Still TLR and a prism is not logical to me and I never looked like I had the looks of a TLR shooter when I got behind it vs. on top of it
Just so you know, although that self-portrait shows the camera on a tripod, much of my early use of my C330 was handheld, at weddings. Always with the prism finder and often with a big Metz 60 series flash attached.Matt, it's a monster TLR to begin with, so prism pales on top of it. I have a prism for Rolleiflex and never used it outside of its case. Sure, we are all different ... and in dire need to collect whatever was made for a camera we own. Still TLR and a prism is not logical to me and I never looked like I had the looks of a TLR shooter when I got behind it vs. on top of it
Who's that good looking guy ...?
To each their own
A single bellows on the outside.Looking at this bellows type TLR from the side I'm suddently beginning to wonder how that actually works. Is is internally divided or are the light beams behind the lens perfect enough to have total optical separation?
Just so you know, although that self-portrait shows the camera on a tripod, much of my early use of my C330 was handheld, at weddings. Always with the prism finder and often with a big Metz 60 series flash attached.
Works real well for group shots , getting the flash up higher , I used a Norman head mounted above the camera with one of those overhead mounting brackets which did a good job but was hard to handle.A prism finder makes a lot of sense with a Metz 60 flash attached!
Prism finders make the Mamiya Cxx much easier to use. My Hasselblad came with a WLF that I never used because I bought a metering prism when I bought the camera.
http://www.baierfoto.de/tlr.htmlTo answer your first question: There is a company in Germany who makes adapters to allow Hasselblad viewfinders (including waist level finder) to be used on the Rolleiflex.
I got mine for around $100 several years ago.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?