We are in the process of getting a digitization grant. But my boss, the archivist told me that they are not convinced in the archivability of digital. Silver gelatin is known to hold out as evidence in the negatives I am printing directly from. Digital has not been proven to be archival.
Congratulations!
I'm very surprised to learn that in times of scanning a museum still runs a darkroom for printing.
Congratulations!
I'm very surprised to learn that in times of scanning a museum still runs a darkroom for printing.
Congratulations!
I'm very surprised to learn that in times of scanning a museum still runs a darkroom for printing.
PE, Sirius, you both hint at photography museums. With those it is not that surprising.
I rather thought of non-photo museums, as that regional historic museum.
I would think a forward thinking archivist would digitize everything NOW as a precaution to something happening down the road. While it's debatable that digital may not be proven for long term, it would be prudent to have parallel archives. The only issue I see is that one will need to keep making copies of drives if one is serious about digital archives.
Whatever happens, DO NOT let the digitization grant slip away in spite of what one thinks of digital archives.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?