photomc said:
Question I have is do those that use more than one alternative process have seperate trays, tongs, magic bursh, shot glass etc for each process? Have been advised by people who's opinion I respect that this should be the case and admit that I have not been diligent about doing this, so wondering how bad my technique has been. Plans are to have seperate tools for each process, but then that does add to the expense of each process...while admiting that the price is small and if an item becomes contaminated then it has to be replaced and two sets will be required.
Most persons will recommend that you have separate brushes, trays, etc. for different processes, especially for Pt./Pd. where the cost of failure can be so high. I don't, however. I use the same brushes for coating kallitype and palladium, and the same trays for developing. In fact, for most prints I use one-tray processing so that all of the chemicals go through the same tray.
I used to be concerned about brushes and when I used hake brushes, which are relatively inexpensive, I kept separate ones for silver and Pt./Pd. processes. Now I use the same Richeson brush to coat kallitype and palladium and I have not so far seen any problems from this. But I am very scrupulous in washing the brush after use, and in storage. I was a bit concerned about this in the beginning, but with a Richeson going for close to $30 for a 1 1/2" brush I figured it was worth the trouble to see if I could use the same one for both processes. However, kallitype and palladium are really such similar processes that they are really like twin brothers in that the sensitive iron is ferric oxalate in both processes.
I do, however, use differnt developers and clearing baths for kallitype and palladium.
I dont want to seem casual about this because in fact I got to great lengths to keep my trays, tongs, etc. clean, which means a very thorough cleaning every month or so, or when any type of sediment builds up on the bottom.
Sandy