Well, he has some knowledge. He only has a point & shot but has used often one of my cameras (a Nikon F65 with a 28-80mm zoom. That is my wife’s camera, that she uses as a P&S) and I explained him the basics (speed, aperture and DOF), although I am quite sure that he has used the programs.
He has the bug right now and that is why I would like to offer him a camera. A manual focus is a good option. The Minolta and the Canon FD came to my mind. They are inexpensive lenses, nice cameras, and I could buy him a body + a 50mm lens for much less than 100€.
But the autofocus bodies are right now at the same price, they are newer and more featured cameras. If you look to Keh.com prices the Nikon F90x costs the same as the Nikon FG (bargain condition, 76$USD). I have them both (in 35mm SLR I only have Nikon gear) and I like them both but the F90x is by far a better camera. And I know that if my FG stops I will not buy another one but another F90x or something like the F801s/N8008s, that costs me almost half the price (right now: 43$USD).
The same with happens with the Canon EOS bodies. The A2E costs 59$USD, just a little more than the T70 (56$USD). I am quite sure that the first camera is a better value.
After some research I realized that the F90x or the ESO 5 would be good cameras, and with possibilities to expand, but I would like to know if you think that one option would be better than the other, or even Pentax or Minolta equivalents. By better option I mean the possibility to bring into play that equipment with digital gear and because he is a student, money is an important issue. The price of later elements to add to the initial combo in order to build a system with less money is not negligible.