Resource icon

Geoffrey Crawley Article: Second of two about 400 speed films (October 2000)

john_s

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Messages
2,140
Location
Melbourne, A
Format
Medium Format
john_s submitted a new resource:

(there was a url link here which no longer exists) - Geoffrey Crawley Article: Second of two about 400 speed films (October 2000)


(there was a url link here which no longer exists)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OP
OP

john_s

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Messages
2,140
Location
Melbourne, A
Format
Medium Format
Hello Murray. I have only just noticed this comment from you. No, you haven't sent those to me. It would be interesting if you could. No hurry, and don't go to too much trouble. My email address you already have.

I'm in the process of choosing a 35mm 400 speed film to take to Italy for 6 weeks. I prefer 120 but I have to minimise carrying stuff. (there's also a risk of theft, too!)

I'm tempted to choose Delta 400. I want to get good enlargements. I'm dubious about Crawley seeming to say that there's not much difference compared to HP5+. I'm still using Neopan400 in 120 size, but I thought the "new tech" films in 35mm might be better.

What do you think?
 

Murray Kelly

Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2007
Messages
661
Location
Brisbane, Australia
Format
Sub 35mm
OK - it's on the way.

I agree about the tabular grain films. No personal experience esp. with 120 but the consensus seems to favour them over the old. It's the 'look' that doesn't suit all. I still dwell in the past and shoot nearly all slow film.

Cheers
Murray
 

williamkazak

Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2006
Messages
46
Location
Lansing, Ill
Format
35mm
I enjoyed reading this. Can anyone point me to current writings about the new T-Max 400 in the 35mm version? The newest version increases development times. T-Max has been my film of choice since I comapared it to Tri-X years ago.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…