general question about surface

David Lyga

Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
3,445
Location
Philadelphia
Format
35mm
Am I the ONLY one out there who finds the matt surface the most exquisite in terms of aesthetics?

I honestly mean this and have never come across anyone who agrees. I know that the blacks are not up to the level that gloss imparts, but the overall image is one of subtlety and beauty, almost like a charcoal drawing. The lack of reflections is of practical merit, but I find matt to look better, aesthetically, than even Ilford's excellent Pearl version. In color as well, there seems to be a neutrality that allows honest objectivity to manifest without the encumbrance of gloss or false intensity. Do I make any sense here? - David Lyga
 

miha

Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2007
Messages
2,966
Location
Slovenia
Format
Multi Format
I love Ilford FB 5K (matt) surface. My favorite. There isn't anything that comes close in RC.
 

RobC

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
3,880
Location
UK
Format
Multi Format
are you talking about RC or FB ?

all surfaces have their merits. It's really just personal preferance. And take your matt surface print and put it on a wall in a poorly lit room and you'll barely be able to see anything in it becasue the resulting contrast of it will be so low. so there are other factors to be considered.

Personally I like glossy FB which isn't as glossy as RC. I don't particularly like matt surface but yes sometimes I've seen prints on it which I like.

I think a lot depends on the image and the style the printer like to print in, hard high impact contrast or soft subtle contrast. You can achieve the latter on glossy paper but its hard to achieve the former on matt paper. Each to his own.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,372
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Matte does not do it for me. I am a glossy guy.
 
Last edited:

Old_Dick

Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2014
Messages
396
Location
03082
Format
Multi Format
Probably doesn't help, love semi-matte.
 

bdial

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
7,469
Location
North East U.S.
Format
Multi Format
Depends on the picture, and of course, your's and the viewer's taste. I like matte for many but not all of my pictures. OTH I really dislike the pearl RC surface, to each their own.
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2006
Messages
839
Location
mid-Missouri
Format
Pinhole
And "Matt" surfaces very considerably so one may float your boat, another may not. Sadly my boat-floater is long gone.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,020
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Anything with "Matt" in it has to be good.

I use RC paper almost exclusively. I like Ilford's Pearl, as well as Oriental Seagull's Pearl. I've recently used a bit of Ilford's Satin surface, and it has some strengths as well.

Back in the day, I liked Kodak's "N" surface.

From a long, long time ago, I was fascinated by a whole bunch of surfaces that Ektalure was offered in.

For FB paper, non-ferrotyped glossy is nice.
 

Nige

Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2002
Messages
2,317
Format
Multi Format
Anything with "Matt" in it has to be good.

groan...

I like Ilford's Pearl, as well as Oriental Seagull's Pearl. I've recently used a bit of Ilford's Satin surface, and it has some strengths as well.

I thought I liked Satin but have migrated back to Pearl. I don't like matt in RC (I bought a box and it's assigned to contact sheets), nor do I like glossy.

In FB I like air dried Glossy (looks a bit like Pearl RC)

I have just got some Art 300 and that's matt and textured. Looks good.
 
OP
OP

David Lyga

Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
3,445
Location
Philadelphia
Format
35mm
This 'reception' is more or less as I imagined: matt surface is appreciated by some die-hards (like me) and disdained by others. Yet, some are rather lukewarm. Aesthetics is an area immensely personal and determined by perception, not fact. Thank you for your feedback. - David Lyga
 

DREW WILEY

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
13,951
Format
8x10 Format
I rarely use matte, but sometimes it is the best choice for a given subject, or perhaps a very troublesome lighting situation with a very big print.
No one shoe fits everyone, or every negative.
 

dpurdy

Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2006
Messages
2,673
Location
Portland OR
Format
8x10 Format
I really don't like RC glossy except for making contact sheets. In FB I find the mat surface too dull so I use air dried glossy.
 

rwreich

Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2012
Messages
344
Location
Greensboro, NC
Format
Multi Format
I've never printed on Matt paper, but I'm curious. I usually print on FB Glossy, but I'm wondering if it's "easier" to compress the tonal range of a high-contrast negative on a Matt paper. Your thoughts?
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
15,708
Location
Switzerland
Format
Multi Format
I love glossy for my abstract work, but prefer matte or semimatte for almost everything else.
Ilford Multigrade Classic Matte (fiber) has the most beautiful surface of any paper I use, in my humble opinion. The semimatte of the warmtone paper is a close second.
I also enjoy the surface of the Foma 123 quite a bit. It is highly reminiscent of the old Agfa 118 paper surface, which is very satisfying.
Finally, Ilford's Art 300 paper is extremely nice with high key subjects. Too much black in a picture and the texture becomes obstructive, but with enough midtones and highlights I think it is super beautiful.
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
7,530
Location
San Clemente, California
Format
Multi Format
Am I the ONLY one out there who finds the matt surface the most exquisite in terms of aesthetics?...I know that the blacks are not up to the level that gloss imparts...
One year later, this thread motivated me to obtain and print on some matte Ilford Multigrade Classic. I hadn't tried a silver gelatin paper that wasn't glossy since the early 1970s.

I'm not sure whether cadmium removal had anything to do with it, but weakness of blacks was even worse than I remember from lo those many decades ago. I agree that, aesthetically, the surface itself is exquisite, but can't overcome a dislike for no image tone denser than dark gray being available.

It is a shame, since matte inkjet prints, while unable to totally match the black levels of glossy gelatin silver, do quite a bit better dealing with low values. Perhaps HARMAN can learn something from that technology and apply it to 'our' papers.
 

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,087
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
Portriga Rapid III (glossy) was my favorite surface. Alas, the Ektalure surfaces were nice, too. But generally, FB glossy was what I printed on. But any surface requires an experienced hand and a practised eye to draw the most out of it.

I make platinum prints -- a whole different appreciation for paper surfaces!
 

Jim Jones

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Messages
3,740
Location
Chillicothe MO
Format
Multi Format
At best prints on matte paper can be magnificent. A fine example is the first edition of Yousuf Karsh's Portraits of Greatness, meticulously printed by Enschede in Holland on matte paper with sheet fed gravure. Later lithographed editions of the same book on glossier paper pale in comparison. However, once a print is viewed behind ordinary glass, much of the advantage of matte paper is lost.
 

Bill Burk

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
9,314
Format
4x5 Format
I'm happy with unferrotyped glossy surface of Ilford Galerie.

Matt surface is beautiful for certain subjects, the kind of print that would cost me a corner cut off my Group F.64 membership card.

You literally get less density range on the print, it literally does not make it easier to fit a full range negative to paper. The shadows do not become as black. But pictorially, aesthetically, when that's what you are going for it works just fine.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…