FX-15, Acutol, Acutol-S.... Help!

From the Garden

D
From the Garden

  • 1
  • 0
  • 351
Kildare

A
Kildare

  • 6
  • 1
  • 704
Sonatas XII-26 (Homes)

A
Sonatas XII-26 (Homes)

  • 3
  • 1
  • 798
Johnny Mills Shoal

H
Johnny Mills Shoal

  • 2
  • 1
  • 691
The Two Wisemen.jpg

H
The Two Wisemen.jpg

  • 0
  • 0
  • 638

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,298
Messages
2,789,320
Members
99,861
Latest member
Thomas1971
Recent bookmarks
0

craigclu

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 8, 2002
Messages
1,305
Location
Rice Lake, Wisconsin
Format
Multi Format
Could anyone clear up what's up with these 3, comparison-wise? I've snooped around the net and all I've found is other people asking the same thing. I mixed a test batch of FX-15 and found that it was much more active than the Acutol data would indicate and I know that FX-15 is mentioned as Acutol-S. The Acutol data at Paterson and on Massive Dev Chart show different dilutions, etc than the FX-15 info seems to indicate. Does anyone have any experience with this?
 

Oldtimer Jay

Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2004
Messages
60
Format
Multi Format
Hi Craig,

I like this developer a lot . In particular, it works better with Fuji 400 than any other developer I have tried, and I have tried plenty. Its activity diluted 1:3 is midway between D76 1:3 and Microphen 1:3, so for any film where times are available for these developers you should get good negatives using the FX 15 at 1:3 with a time half way between them and with 4 gentle inversions per minute.

Acutol S and FX15 are, to the best of my knowledge, identical.
Good Luck!

Jay L
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom