• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Fujinon W


That has also been my experience with the Fujinon 250 / 6.7. The later Fujinon 250 / 6.3 CM-W seems noticeably better compared to the early 250 / 6.7 Fujinon. Still. in my experience the 6.7 early W is on par with the similarly single-coated 240 mm Schneider G-Claron and both seem more than good enough for most uses. The 250/6.7 Fujinons that I've recently seen on Ebay are often pretty affordable..
 
Yes, they did have a lens distributor, DO Industries into the late 80s or early 90s. Then they dropped the line and only direct importer dealers imported them.
 
Reading a lot about Fujinon lenses I found the statement that Fuji as first optimized the lenses to micro contrast for edgesharpness, so they look sharp but are not that good in resolution.

IMO, this kind of detailed concern (contrast vs resolution) is the kind of thing that, let us say, 35mm rangefinder users have a tendency to worry about. But for large format it shouldn't be anyone's first concern. Depth of field, focus errors, not making double exposures, film loading, light leaks ... Any modern lens will likely be good enough to let you make all the other mistakes.
 
....Depth of field, focus errors, not making double exposures, film loading, light leaks ..
I was shooting 5x7 quite for a while untill they stopped slide film, now I still have a 12x16 (30x40cm) baby, so I know about this issues. ^^
 
I've never seen any LF gear in person and couldn't find any info anywhere on the actual weight of the W series lenses. Specifically the Fujinon-NW 5.6/180 and the SWD 5.6/90.

ht.
I have both the Fujinon 90/5.6 SWD and also the Nikkor 90/8 SW. Both are 105 degree ultrawide angle lenses and both have comparably high image quality. However the 90/5.6 Fujinon is really too large and heavy for any field work (82mm filter), so I then bought the Nikkor 90/8 (67mm filter). Although I retain and like both, I prefer the Nikkor.
 
The 250/6.7 was a remarkable lens for it's era - lightwt in no.1 shutter yet with image circle room to spare even on 8x10 film (not the case with their subsequent slightly faster 250's). I was amazed at how sharp the detail was, and how rich and contrasty the hue rendering despite being single-coated, versus my previous experience with Symmar S lenses - good in their own right, but not equal to the Fuji. It was eventually stolen, and I replaced it with both a G-Claron and Fuji A of similar focal length - lighter and more compact still, with just as a big an image circle but even better corrected, esp the tiny Fuji A.
 
just got a Fujinon W150/5.6 outside lettering in quite nice condition; now I hope to get some hints what f-stops you guys are using on it.
 
just got a Fujinon W150/5.6 outside lettering in quite nice condition; now I hope to get some hints what f-stops you guys are using on it.
I only contact print, so I do not worry about closing all the way if I need to.
 
You gotta be careful with Fuji brochures. I have some of them and they're full of random typos. The lenses themselves are great.