Because you can choose an emulsion that has a colour saturation, contrast level and colour palate that's most suitable the task in hand .
I could, and should have said that......and I have already corrected my original statement and said "sorry". I am also sorry that I am not perfect.
(Although it always amazes me that people actually rely on ANY information published on the Internet without checking.....)
Apart from price, do you see any other advantages in Fuji Sensia or Kodak Elitechrome?
Tom
On the contrary I've been amazed that Fuji still makes so many E-6 emulsions: Velvia, Sensia, Astia, Trebi, Provia and T64.
I'm afraid that Trebi has been discontinued.....
I look at the discontinuance of Sensia films as a positive thing. It was a cheap consumer product only available in 35mm and I feel the film really had nothing special going for it except the price. If people loved it they would have bought it ...lots of it and Fuji would still be making it. Now hopefully those Sensia shooters will shoot on Provia and Velvia or Astia or any number of the reversal films out on the market. There is tons to choose from! I had a client in my lab yesterday and we were printing an ilfochrome print for him from a miss treated Sensia slide and I commented on how just recently Fuji has stopped making this product. well he was shocked and upset and said "oh no i loved that film it was cheap and wonderful" ....as the conversation progressed i came to learn he had not shot on this film type in almost 5 years!!! and two things came to mine. First was ...here is a man going for a film because it is cheap, and not because of its imaging qualities. yet he was spending thousands on ilfochrome prints from his cheap film! in the long run a few extra bucks for the fuji pro films is irrelevant. and secondly if he loved the film so much why hasnt be bought any in 5 years???
I say congratulations to Fuji. It must never be an easy decision to terminate a product but I think this is a good move as hopefully it will strengthen the sales of their professional film products.
How can any restriction of choice be a positive thing? If something suits someone because it is cheaper (though "less expensive" might be more apt these days), then good luck to them. "A few extra bucks" might be irrelevant for you, but for someone with limited funds it might equate to spending the same total sum of money on a smaller number of films, which does film sales no good at all. As for this move strengthening the sales of Fuji's professional products, I guess it won't do Kodak's film sales any harm either!
Steve
I look at the discontinuance of Sensia films as a positive thing. It was a cheap consumer product only available in 35mm and I feel the film really had nothing special going for it except the price. If people loved it they would have bought it ...lots of it and Fuji would still be making it. Now hopefully those Sensia shooters will shoot on Provia and Velvia or Astia or any number of the reversal films out on the market. There is tons to choose from! I had a client in my lab yesterday and we were printing an ilfochrome print for him from a miss treated Sensia slide and I commented on how just recently Fuji has stopped making this product. well he was shocked and upset and said "oh no i loved that film it was cheap and wonderful" ....as the conversation progressed i came to learn he had not shot on this film type in almost 5 years!!! and two things came to mine. First was ...here is a man going for a film because it is cheap, and not because of its imaging qualities. yet he was spending thousands on ilfochrome prints from his cheap film! in the long run a few extra bucks for the fuji pro films is irrelevant. and secondly if he loved the film so much why hasnt be bought any in 5 years???
I say congratulations to Fuji. It must never be an easy decision to terminate a product but I think this is a good move as hopefully it will strengthen the sales of their professional film products.
I look at the discontinuance of Sensia films as a positive thing. It was a cheap consumer product only available in 35mm and I feel the film really had nothing special going for it except the price. If people loved it they would have bought it ...lots of it and Fuji would still be making it. Now hopefully those Sensia shooters will shoot on Provia and Velvia or Astia or any number of the reversal films out on the market. There is tons to choose from! I had a client in my lab yesterday and we were printing an ilfochrome print for him from a miss treated Sensia slide and I commented on how just recently Fuji has stopped making this product. well he was shocked and upset and said "oh no i loved that film it was cheap and wonderful" ....as the conversation progressed i came to learn he had not shot on this film type in almost 5 years!!! and two things came to mine. First was ...here is a man going for a film because it is cheap, and not because of its imaging qualities. yet he was spending thousands on ilfochrome prints from his cheap film! in the long run a few extra bucks for the fuji pro films is irrelevant. and secondly if he loved the film so much why hasnt be bought any in 5 years???
I say congratulations to Fuji. It must never be an easy decision to terminate a product but I think this is a good move as hopefully it will strengthen the sales of their professional film products.
Or does anyone know another E6 alternative for 4€/roll?
- Unless Fuji had a different approach than Kodak (doubtful), there is no "consumer film" that is a different product from a pro film. Consumer films were just a "stabilized" (slightly aged) and repackaged version of some pro formulation. That means any company that sold both a consumer and a pro film was competing with itself. Sensia's loss is probably an extension to the changes in Provia and Astia. Fuji had a rather bewildering array of product offering, and needed to rationalize it.
- Unless Fuji had a different approach than Kodak (doubtful), there is no "consumer film" that is a different product from a pro film. Consumer films were just a "stabilized" (slightly aged) and repackaged version of some pro formulation.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?