Fuji GW690II

Frank Dean,  Blacksmith

A
Frank Dean, Blacksmith

  • 5
  • 3
  • 40
Woman wearing shades.

Woman wearing shades.

  • 0
  • 1
  • 45
Curved Wall

A
Curved Wall

  • 5
  • 0
  • 77
Crossing beams

A
Crossing beams

  • 9
  • 1
  • 100
Shadow 2

A
Shadow 2

  • 5
  • 1
  • 70

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,839
Messages
2,781,679
Members
99,725
Latest member
saint_otrott
Recent bookmarks
0

Rich C.

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2017
Messages
1
Location
Chicago
Format
Medium Format
Indeed! I've been shooting with a newly acquired GSW680iii and it is an amazing machine - so easy to load and stash in a bag and have with me for huge negatives when traveling around the city. I love mine!
 

EdColorado

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2009
Messages
506
Location
Loveland, Co
Format
Multi Format
I love my GW690II and need to use it more (too many cameras). As others have mentioned, I feel the sound gets a bad rap. Its not a classic sound, but its no where near as loud as some people say. Not to me at least, and I don't see heads turning every time I fire one off.

For a meter I chose the Voigtlander VCII as seen in the link below. I got a black one, and while it looks large on a "normal" rangefinder, on the Fuji it fits perfectly. Plenty sensitive, very accurate, its a wonderful meter.

See it here:

https://www.cameraquest.com/voivcmet2.htm

I find the Fuji to be an excellent hand hold camera. I shot the following at 1/15 at f3.5 on Arista EDU 100.

33161077212_206d3ccfe1_c.jpg
 

mfmike

Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2013
Messages
32
Format
Med. Format RF
While I don't know if this is true for the model ii, one of the things I appreciate on my model iii is the large spacing between the negs on the roll. Makes it easy to trim the roll after developing without botching the shots!
Cheers,
Mike
 

Prest_400

Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2009
Messages
1,438
Location
Sweden
Format
Med. Format RF
I love my GW690II and need to use it more (too many cameras). As others have mentioned, I feel the sound gets a bad rap. Its not a classic sound, but its no where near as loud as some people say. Not to me at least, and I don't see heads turning every time I fire one off.
It's a bit of "videogame railgun" sound but not that bad. I think it gets a bad rap on size also because it is compared to 35mm cameras because of the form factor and rather light also. AFAIK A Hassy kit weighs also around 1.5 kg but so does a Nikon F5.
It's quite convenient, integrated RF focusing and metering with a small handheld like a Sekonic L308 can be quite quick. THen, the lack of meter.. Some complain about it but most MF cameras neither the classic Leica M's have one. I was infact quicker than a slow newbie digi shooter friend.
 

braxus

Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2005
Messages
1,784
Location
Fraser Valley B.C. Canada
Format
Hybrid
I'm thinking of getting this camera. Is there any reason to not get the version 1 of the GW690 over version 2? Also what are people using for metering when using this camera? Seems silly to bring along a second camera just to use its light meter. I downloaded a light meter app for my Samsung phone, but is it accurate enough for film use? My plan is to get both a GSW690 and a GW690II.
 
Last edited:

DREW WILEY

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
13,934
Format
8x10 Format
Use a light meter, of course. Just depends on what kind of accuracy you need. I use Pentax digital spotmeters for all my cameras. As far as I'm concerned, cell phones have no use in the mountains except for skipping across a pond when a flat pebble is not available.
 

Dan Daniel

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 4, 2009
Messages
2,883
Location
upstate New York
Format
Medium Format
I'm thinking of getting this camera. Is there any reason to not get the version 1 of the GW690 over version 2? Also what are people using for metering when using this camera? Seems silly to bring along a second camera just to use its light meter. I downloaded a light meter app for my Samsung phone, but is it accurate enough for film use? My plan is to get both a GSW690 and a GW690II.

I and II are basically the same camera except for the exterior trim pieces. I imagine that some minor tweaks were made here and there; camera companies are always fine tuning mechanics, even in the middle of the same model name. But for all practical purposes, same camera. Just look closely for wear, any signs of corrosion, heavy use, etc.

Light meters are all simply guides. Experience and most any meter can be workable. Here's a great overview of the issues-
http://www.fredparker.com/ultexp1.htm
 

papagene

Membership Council
Council
Joined
Jun 11, 2004
Messages
5,436
Location
Tucson, AZ
Format
Multi Format
The differences are minimal... get whichever one is in the best condition. You will be quite pleased with the results of either version.
 

destroya

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 23, 2012
Messages
1,215
Location
Willamette Valley, OR
Format
Multi Format
I have a version i and iii and much prefer the version1, only because of the annoying retractable hood. to me, that is the main and only difference between them. yes there are others, but they really don't mean anything to me
 

Deleted member 88956

I was looking for III simply because it was newer, but then looks alone won me over quick and started exploring II, once a near new came into view I snapped it and could not be happier.A beast for good reasons, but all for the good of associate joy. I continue to dislike the looks of III vs. II but that is all the gripe I have as I have never shot a roll on a III.
 

Alex Varas

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 24, 2018
Messages
817
Location
Bilbao
Format
Medium Format
I would say I don’t miss any 120 film here, said that I can’t miss what I don’t know :smile: Ilford, Kodak, Fuji and Foma, Bergger are the most found, the biggest shop has Rollei as well, Cinestill at very few places.
 

norm123

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2010
Messages
278
Location
Montréal
Format
Multi Format
Very good camera. You will be very happy. The result are great. I love mine and his brother GSW690. I use them mainly for landscape and with a tripod, it's gorgeous. Simple to operate. Good luck.
 

4season

Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
1,981
Format
Plastic Cameras
Wonderful cameras, but you can very easily burn through several rolls of film without even trying!
 

sixby45

Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2018
Messages
140
Location
Chicago
Format
Medium Format
I am curious about the camera too. My questions are: Is the Range finder easy to use and is it accurate? Is the reportedly high contrast lens overly so? Is it manageable with proper film processing?

Dennis

For sure! I've had both the II and the III and have heard people say that both were easier to focus.

For me I find the III rangefinder update easier to see but others swear that the II is brighter. To be honest either will be easy and fast to focus when you practice - as I used both for street and event shooting and didn't have difficulty grabbing focus on the run.

Great cameras and the lens does what it is supposed to and well - I believe that the EBC coatings are the same on the II and III, but both are very optimized for color rendition and pull great specular highlights. The biggest issue for me using it in a studio setting is only having 8 shots before reloading. This can slow you down a bit though perhaps you can have two and cruise along :smile:

A great camera and one that doesn't have the name recognition of say rollei or hasselblad but definitely one of my favorites!
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom