Fuji gw670

The Urn does not approve...

D
The Urn does not approve...

  • 1
  • 2
  • 20
35mm in 616 test

A
35mm in 616 test

  • 0
  • 1
  • 18
Smiley

H
Smiley

  • 0
  • 1
  • 35

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,479
Messages
2,759,836
Members
99,384
Latest member
z1000
Recent bookmarks
1

Timothy Hyde

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 10, 2019
Messages
36
Location
Richmond, Va
Format
Medium Format
Does anyone know if the size and form factor of the Fuji GW670 is the same as the GW690 (or GW680 for that matter)? Thanks
Tim
 

voceumana

Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2004
Messages
896
Location
USA (Utah)
Format
Multi Format
They are all built on the same body, so, yes they are the same size. Same lens, too. just a different image gate and film spacing gearing.
 

itsdoable

Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2013
Messages
810
Location
Canada
Format
Medium Format
Not only the same body, but the exact same body casting :

FujiGW670_film_gate.jpg


... they just glue baffles to reduce the original film gate down to 6x7....
 
OP
OP

Timothy Hyde

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 10, 2019
Messages
36
Location
Richmond, Va
Format
Medium Format
It's very interesting to see the price differences for essentially the same rig. Fuji gw670 is roughly 3 times the price of a GW690, on eBay, (even more for the real mint ones) and an even greater differential between the GW670 and the GW680.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
51,949
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
To a great extent, this family of cameras were directed to a particular commercial and professional market segment in Japan. If I understand things correctly, there were many more of the 6x9 versions sold.
I would really like one of the 6x8 ones.
 
OP
OP

Timothy Hyde

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 10, 2019
Messages
36
Location
Richmond, Va
Format
Medium Format
Why do you want one, Matt? I was thinking the same thing, but can't figure out a good reason. I have both 6x9s so why do I need a 6x7 and 6x8? Still....I do.
Tim
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
51,949
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
I like the 4/3 (or should it be 3/4?) aspect ratio.
And I really like how all nine of the negatives will fit nicely on a single Printfile page!
Currently it doesn't make a lot of sense, as my 4x5 enlarger is in storage and my other enlargers top out at 6x7.
But when it comes to a Texas Leica, what is the point of making sense? :whistling:
 

Ariston

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2019
Messages
1,658
Location
Atlanta
Format
Multi Format
I keep telling myself I don't need my 6x9. I really don't use it all that much... but those negatives are glorious. And it is worth more to me than what I can get out of it (most of my cameras are beaters).
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom