Does the lens on the II have a built-in lens shade, or did that first appear on the III?
Hahaha... just out of curiosity, what is it about the lens shade that you don't like? Or do you just dislike lens shades in general?Both the II and III have the built-in shade. I really hate that shade--but not enough to saw it off.
Lens shades--I love. However, the one on the Fuji is permanent and it slides back and forth--usually back, when you don't want it to--covering the shutter speed dial and focusing rings--and making a general nuisance of itself. Your choice: saw or gaffers tape.
Haha this sounds like a nightmare, about to pick one of these up though I think
Are you saying that Sirius is actually a Russian bot?I think all these “what camera” threads are coming back up so “you should get a hasselblad” can be inserted.
Are you saying that Sirius is actually a Russian bot?
I agree!Actually, taking a saw to that pesky hood sounds like a good idea. Aftermarket hoods are cheap.
And the film spools are easy to change. I love these cameras.Hmm I've had both the II and the III - I actually prefer the III since to me it's covering made it easier to hold instead of the checkered plastic grips - and the viewfinder on the III switched to the gold patch I believe modelled on the leica version of the rangefinder.
To me the II rangefinder patch was bright but I found the III easier though people seem to have their own opinion of course as I've heard that the II is brighter etc.
Both II and III are awesome - I'm not a fan of the I since it's got a cold shoe and usually more clicks on the shutter.
Either one will make amazingly large negatives though and is very portable - I've used it for street shooting and events as well as portraits in studio and it delivers in spades!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?