• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Fuji discontinuing sales of pre-cut RA-4 sheets

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
203,291
Messages
2,852,469
Members
101,766
Latest member
Onetrick
Recent bookmarks
0

MCB18

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 16, 2023
Messages
1,543
Location
Colorado
Format
Medium Format
And I guess Kodak doesn't sell RA-4 paper in sheets either.
Well, you’d be mostly right. The thing you get wrong though, is that they don’t sell RA4 paper at all.
 
Last edited:
For what it's worth I've been trying to get my hands on some of the JDM CLP for a while, just to test it out and see how it compares to the papers coated in the Netherlands like DP-II and Maxima.

From what I've read, this stuff was optimized for optical enlargement by enthusiasts, meaning that it's likely this discontinuance represents the death of the last "optical native" paper.

Kind of a non-issue for me in the US since it's been unavailable, I couldn't even get anyone to forward me some.
 
For what it's worth I've been trying to get my hands on some of the JDM CLP for a while, just to test it out and see how it compares to the papers coated in the Netherlands like DP-II and Maxima.

From what I've read, this stuff was optimized for optical enlargement by enthusiasts, meaning that it's likely this discontinuance represents the death of the last "optical native" paper.

Kind of a non-issue for me in the US since it's been unavailable, I couldn't even get anyone to forward me some.

There are 13(?) types of paper listed on this page: https://www.fujifilm.com/us/en/business/photofinishing/paper-lab-products

Do you know more about the types actually available and any differences? I've always been curious.
 
This announcement relates to their Japanese domestic product 富士フイルムカラーペーパー(CLP)(Fujifilm color paper).

Yes, that's right. For the rest of the world, the situation varies. In some locales, there's cut-sheet paper being sold in Fuji-branded boxes, supposedly cut & boxed either by or for Fuji. There's also places where 3rd parties cut & box sheets of Fuji RA4 paper, sometimes under their own brand name, sometimes under Fuji's product name, but no logo etc. And in some places, there's just no Fuji cut-sheet to be had, only rolls, or not even rolls.

So...it varies.

this stuff was optimized for optical enlargement by enthusiasts
If this is about the paper linked to in post #1: well...possibly. It's never quite clear what's happening in Japan. If it's "optimized for optical enlargement", the most likely scenario is that this is just an old formulation from 20+ years ago when color paper was optimized for optical enlargement by default. Somewhere in that timeframe this 'optimization' was abandoned because that niche sort of disappeared, and the combination of digital dominance and economics (i.e. cost-down) dictated optimizations that resulted in slightly less optimal performance when the paper is used for optical printing. In practice, it's not all that much of an issue because the "digital" papers print quite well, optically.

However, I understand that when European RA4 paper manufacture definitively abandoned the full optical enlargement optimization, there was some pushback from Fuji Japan as they were concerned about this. I don't know what those concerns were, except that they were ultimately brushed aside. My interpretation is that Fuji Japan wanted to maintain that optimization as a courtesy to the remaining few analog printers, but that the European entities saw no way to rationalize a relatively costly legacy in the face of competitive pressure, and that the economic argument prevailed. Mind you, this is years ago.

To the best of my knowledge, no Japanese-made Fuji RA4 paper has been retailed in the US or Europe, or indeed most of the world, outside of Japan (this does not apply to FujiFlex, which is only made in Japan and sold internationally, but it's technically not a paper). So indeed, the disappearance of this particular cut-sheet product, which may or may not have been a relict of the old pre-digital era, is kind of moot for most of the world. It has very little practical implications one way or another: it wasn't available to begin with, and effective alternatives have been available all this time.

Take the US website with a grain of salt. It's not necessarily representative of the actual papers manufactured. E.g. it still lists the FujiTrans product line, which was discontinued several years ago. To complicate matters, papers manufactured in Europe (which is what you buy in the US) are sometimes sold under a different product name in the US, even though it's the same paper. The net result is that the US website can contain reference to papers that are no longer made, papers that are made and sold under a different name in Europe, and papers that are available in Europe by the same name.
The official website for the RA4 paper and chemistry channel is this one: https://www.originalphotopaper.com/range/photo-papers/
This website is actively maintained by the business unit that markets the papers and oversees its manufacture. The US website is maintained by the American business unit which is not directly related to the paper business, other than that they act as an internal customer.
 
I started a post on Maxima last week. All the Fuji big roll products I've worked with so far work perfectly fine and quite predictably using optical enlargement - CAii, Super C, Fujiflex Supergloss, and now Maxima. But every label of cut sheet product I've seen is simply the least expensive Fuji Crystal Archive product. There's no more Kodak paper around at all unless its old.

Fuji's decision to no longer offer convenient cut sheet is something merely reaching its inevitable endpoint. It used to be, that you could buy all their professional papers that way, at least up to 30X40 inch sheet size. But today, all the major bulk users are equipped with programmable automated XY roll cutting machines, and most (not all, internationally) have gone over to industrial laser exposure printing devices, allowing for intermediate software correction of scanned images. So it's now simply not profitable for Fuji themselves to provide cut sheet anymore.

But if the demand is there, there's nothing stopping an intermediate marketing company from cutting down and boxing, and private-labeling, some favorite paper. But that necessarily involves a higher markup to the end user. They don't provide that service for free.

And given my recent tests with Maxima, which are still ongoing, I see absolutely no difference between its look, "digitally optimized" and prints from the same master
control negative on "optimized for both optical enlargement and digital printing"
Fujiflex, other than the sheen itself, due to the expensive polyester base. Just because something has been improved in its digital response, relative to laser printers, doesn't mean it has been dis-improved relative to conventional enlarger colorheads. I see more of a win-win scenario. The papers are better than ever, even for those with traditional colorhead enlargers.

I can't speak for narrow-roll Photofinisher snapshot papers, designed for extremely fast exposures. The different labeling of those between the US and the EU is a further source of confusion. About all I have figured out is, among big roll options, commercial Super C ii is apparently NOT equivalent to Euro DP II. But "Maxima" is Maxima everywhere, and "Fujiflex Supergloss" is Fujiflex Supergloss everywhere, and has existed in its "optimized" II version for the past 15 years. Here, CAii cut sheet is often marketed ambiguously as simply, CA, in its big roll fashion. Alas, even different dealers can have different designations for the same thing.
 
Last edited:
I know what is meant by "digital balanced", but I wonder, has there ever been any color paper, at least since the days of EP-2, that was really optimized for enlarging. The reason for my doubt is that practically all pictures made in commercial labs, excluding those made manually with enlargers, have always been based on additive system, with three separate exposures of R, G, and B. The results do not look exactly the same as those made with an enlarger using a subtractive color head.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom