• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Fuji 400H Film Development Problems

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
201,903
Messages
2,831,924
Members
101,014
Latest member
photomaximo
Recent bookmarks
0

Ohweis

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
8
Format
Med. Format Pan
Hello everyone,
Today I went to local lab to develop my 120 Fuji 400H. After scanning I noticed unusual color cast on some of my negs (please see pictures). Film was fresh and my Bronica 645 magazine has no any problems or leaks. What is it? Lab old chemicals?
Will appreciate any input.
 

Attachments

  • fuji-400-0100.jpg
    fuji-400-0100.jpg
    164.5 KB · Views: 170

trythis

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 26, 2013
Messages
1,208
Location
St Louis
Format
35mm
How old was the film?
 
OP
OP

Ohweis

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
8
Format
Med. Format Pan
Will expire in May, 2015. Came from US to Canada, I don't think they X-rayed it on the border.
 

Nuff

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Feb 16, 2013
Messages
581
Location
Tokyo, Japan
Format
Multi Format
Are you sure you don't have a light leak? kind of looks like one...

Also it looks to me like scanning issue, the black point isn't set properly.
 

georgegrosu

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 15, 2007
Messages
434
Location
Bucharest, R
Format
Multi Format
The picture shows purple in positive (some zone).
Possible causes: improper storage of film, stop of developer slow and uneven ..
Perhaps it is the transition of your film from developer to the next solution
with an excess of developer.
Not went well the clear drops.
Solutions are generally homogeneous and even if it was old it came out so the whole surface film.

George
 

georgegrosu

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 15, 2007
Messages
434
Location
Bucharest, R
Format
Multi Format
Failure that you see in your image reminds me of two things:
- In 1990, a friend built a developer machine for color paper.
We are working with color paper AZOMURES.
After the first test pictures appeared on areas / streaks - purple.
Color developer working at 31 °C, and the solution was next at °20 C.
I realized that it produces condensate developer the cover
above that fall on the paper machine developed is before bleachers.
I put a baffle to direct condensate fall into developer and solved the problem.
- The color slides Provia 400 (expired for several years) I fault similar to yours.
E6 processing I using a recipe that I improvised.
Velvia 50 (all expired) get it right with the same process E6.
What happened to your film I does not know how to tell you.
For that is interesting photographic processes.
Have a mystery.

George
 

scheimfluger_77

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 21, 2006
Messages
839
Location
mid-Missouri
Format
Pinhole
Hello everyone,
Today I went to local lab to develop my 120 Fuji 400H. After scanning I noticed unusual color cast on some of my negs (please see pictures). Film was fresh and my Bronica 645 magazine has no any problems or leaks. What is it? Lab old chemicals?
Will appreciate any input.

How do the negatives in question look to the eye? You say some of the negs are OK? If it were a lab problem the entire roll would be affected similarly. I'm guessing underexposure but it does seem that the black areas of the scan lack "substance." That would indicate a processing problem.
 

MartinP

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jun 23, 2007
Messages
1,569
Location
Netherlands
Format
Medium Format
There is something really strange about that film, it is full of colours while this is the black-and-white sub-forum. Is the OP able to move it to the colour/color sub-forum, or does that need a mod?
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
20,348
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
Without knowing the real scene it is difficult to say but the colours all look right except for being seriously "washed out". Have you had any prints done from this neg?

pentaxuser
 
OP
OP

Ohweis

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
8
Format
Med. Format Pan
Thanks for all your replies. I just talked to lab owner where film was developed, he told me it possible that film was under impact of heat damage. I am attaching second image... What do you think?
 

Attachments

  • fuji--PRO_400-H.jpg
    fuji--PRO_400-H.jpg
    842.2 KB · Views: 114
Last edited by a moderator:

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
20,348
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
Looks better than the first neg but while muted colours are OK I'd say this is still a little washed out. I don't know what heat damage looks like unfortunately so can't comment further

pentaxuser
 

perkeleellinen

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 14, 2008
Messages
2,921
Location
Warwickshire
Format
35mm
Sometimes when a 120 roll is finished it isn't rolled tight enough and light gets in. I wonder if those purple casts down both edges are a sign of this.
 

polyglot

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jun 12, 2009
Messages
3,467
Location
South Australia
Format
Medium Format
Did you scan it yourself? Because that looks kind of like a common scanning error (light bleed/flare due to lack of mask around a particularly dense negative) that has been corrected with auto-levels. My guess is that it's just a really bad scan. Do you have successful (high quality) scans from other rolls?

If you look at the negative, is there any (magenta) fogging extending out of the frame boundary which would produce the green fog we're seeing in the middle of each frame? Can you post a digital photo of the negative held up against a white background on your PC screen?
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
This is a C41 film. When one of these negatives look washed out it is invariably bad development. The scan looks underdeveloped. You say more are like this, but imply scans. Seeing them would help.

PE`
 
OP
OP

Ohweis

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
8
Format
Med. Format Pan
Scanner is completely fine. I scanned at the same time another roll of Portra film and it was okay.
 

georgegrosu

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 15, 2007
Messages
434
Location
Bucharest, R
Format
Multi Format
Image with Provia 400 expired in september 2001 - developed at home in february 2007.
In the bottom left shows a defect similar to yours.

Dead Link Removed

George
 
OP
OP

Ohweis

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
8
Format
Med. Format Pan
Thanks!!! I'm going to shoot another roll of Fuji 400 film from the same butch and develop it in another lab to compare to what I have now
 

georgegrosu

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 15, 2007
Messages
434
Location
Bucharest, R
Format
Multi Format
OP
OP

Ohweis

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
8
Format
Med. Format Pan
Just got my film from the same batch developed in another lab and it came nice and clean as it should (see attached) Seems like previous lab ruined my film. Thanks everyone for your replies!
 

Attachments

  • fuji-400-repeat-0121.jpg
    fuji-400-repeat-0121.jpg
    867 KB · Views: 103
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom