On a back surface mirror there are two reflections, a faint one from the front surface and a strong one from the silvered bottom surface.
These will show a double image offset in an amount proportional to the thickness of the glass.
The amount of lateral offset between the two rays is dependant on the thickness of the glass. It thus is a constant per mirror.
However the ratio of this constant off-set to the image width at the film plane varies by the location of the mirror!
That is why in the past at cameras nevertheless thick mirrors were used or even thick and foil mirrors combined.
There's no difference in making/coating a front or rear surface mirror, rear surface mirrors usually have a protective layer painted over the coating,
These days most mirrors are Aluminium coated rather than Silver, and a thin Silicone layer isnadded to front coated mirrors for protection, I get mine made in London for restoring early MF/LF SLRs. The company I use will either strip clean an existing mirror (just dip in Nitric acid to remove the Silver, or cut a new one.
This shows clearly why Silver is not the best long term solution, it's the mirror from a Quarter plate Thornton Pickard Ruby Reflex, Most post WWII screens are probably Aluminium coated. Vacuum coating mirrors will be a spin off of optical coatings. Silver coatings were a dip/paste process.
Making a new mirror, with front surface is not a very complicated task.
I tried to use rear surface mirrors in my rolleiflex and the effect is that you will get ghosting due to the internal reflections in the glass. You also move the area of reflection (focus issues) back by the thickness of the glass itself.
On a back surface mirror there are two reflections, a faint one from the front surface and a strong one from the silvered bottom surface.
These will show a double image offset in an amount proportional to the thickness of the glass.
That would be Ground Glass image - more often referred to this way by those who use large format cameras, but it applies equally to roll film (and DSLRs for that matter).
And it is not only about finder images. For instance in colour seperation beam-splitter cameras mirrors (and their flaws) are part of the exposing ray-cone. (I hinted at that above.)
And it is not only about finder images. For instance in colour seperation beam-splitter cameras mirrors (and their flaws) are part of the exposing ray-cone. (I hinted at that above.)
Not to mention astronomical "reflecting" telescopes. Since WW2, most use mirrors that are aluminum coated after the mirror is ground to the desired shape. AS has been mentioned this process is done by vaporizing a piece of aluminum in a vacium, not by chemical means.......Regards!