This is awesome. I hope he wins and sets a precedent. There's lots of pictures of me playing soccer tournaments when I was younger that make me look lazy and gangly....I want better pictures!
If I was the judge in this case I'd rule that the complainant should pay the defendants legal costs of $50,000, pay them $ 100,000 compensation for their pain and suffering, and the two divorcees be ordered by the court to re-create their wedding night
Probably Matt, but no more unfair than hounding an 87 year old WW11 veteran, his family and the business he spent a lifetime building up.
Probably Matt, but no more unfair than hounding an 87 year old WW11 veteran, his family and the business he spent a lifetime building up.
I wasn't suggesting that her ex-husband should be excluded from the suggested remedy - although some appropriate substitute would clearly be needed for the "bride".
WW11
Perhaps one of those blow up female dolls they sell in sex shops Matt, that if punctured fly all over the room like a balloon, this is not from personal experience, I hasten to add
Damn, I didn't know there were nine more. You Europeans been fighting behind our back?
If I was the judge in this case I'd rule that the complainant should pay the defendants legal costs of $50,000
If I was the defendant in this case, I don't think I would spend £1 (or $1) defending it. I don't see how it has got to $50,000. It shouldn't have even got to court.
Steve.
If you don't defend you lose by default.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?