From tail board cameras to ...Front focus?

Jekyll driftwood

H
Jekyll driftwood

  • 0
  • 0
  • 11
It's also a verb.

D
It's also a verb.

  • 2
  • 0
  • 23
The Kildare Track

A
The Kildare Track

  • 11
  • 4
  • 108
Stranger Things.

A
Stranger Things.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 74

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,914
Messages
2,783,017
Members
99,745
Latest member
Javier Tello
Recent bookmarks
0

mark

Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2003
Messages
5,703
Okay, I was just flipping through the Antique and Classic Camera website and was wondering, for no other purpose than curiosity, when large format cameras moved from the tail board rear focusing design to the....well if it is not a tail board, and it would be rude to call it a phallus board front focusing camera...I will just call it the way it is done now?

I actually have a tail focusing 5x7 "dental camera" that I got dirt cheap. Why did folks build them that way? What a PIA. At what point did someone with some common sense say, "okay, this sucks. Wouldn't it be easier to focus if this damn rail was not jabbing me in the neck or giving me a crick as I try to look over the rail from the side."?

Yeah I am avoiding my homework again. This whole PhD thing is wearing me out.
 

Ole

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 9, 2002
Messages
9,245
Location
Bergen, Norway
Format
Large Format
Both yes and now, and it's also a question of geography.

The classic German "Reisekameras" are "tailboard cameras", but even in Germany there was also production of the "Englische Type" front-focus cameras at the same time. The Resiekameras were copied by the Soviets, and were in production until very recently.

Most monorails can be considered as either. Try focusing a WA lens (say 90mm) at infinity with a Linhof Color, and you will get a bruised neck. At least I did...

Conclusion: so many different cameras have been produced over such a long time in so many parts of the world at different times that the question is meaningless.
 
OP
OP

mark

Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2003
Messages
5,703
Like I said, curiosity.
 

paul ewins

Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2006
Messages
446
Location
Melbourne, A
Format
4x5 Format
One reason for the tailboard design was the physical size of the "rapid" lenses which needed a very solid front standard. They still had movements, but only on the rear standard.

For a dental camera it makes sense too, as you would be doing closeups. With front focusing you're magnification would change as the lens moved. but with rear focusing the lens to subject distance remains the same so only the focus is affected.

Once camera design got past sliding boxes to bellows both designs appear to have existed side by side for a few decades until film improvements negated the need for the Brass cannon style of lens.
 

Frank R

Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2006
Messages
351
Format
Large Format
I think the tail board design was used earlier because it incorporated a simple light trap; light entering the gap between the two boxes would have to make a 180 degree turn in order to fog the film (plate).

If the front box was smaller, the light could enter almost straight in, at least along the edges.

The tail board was a simple, effective, low tech solution to light leaks.
 

John Kasaian

Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Messages
1,021
The the bodies on my 5x7 Agfa Ansco Universals can be reveresed 0n the rails to be either a tailboard or schlong :wink: focusing. What a "universal" design!
 
OP
OP

mark

Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2003
Messages
5,703
So that would be a camera that swings both ways :D
 

jimgalli

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
4,236
Location
Tonopah Neva
Format
ULarge Format
The Calumet C1 is a tailboard that was sold into the mid 1980's. Yes, a pita.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom