Bob Carnie
Subscriber
I am concerned only about pigment process, in fact over the weekend I taught a course on tri colour gum over palladium, where we started to use
an assortment of pigments other than cmy only.
what was very interesting is when we started using opaque pigments in conjunction with a shadow only negative.. the result was nothing short of remarkable
We used blue over the palladium, basically a negative that only showed the deepest of shadows, so the dmax jumped right off the page, we also spent a lot of time with
the midtone negative which we added different pigments with some incredible shifts in print contrast and tonality very much worth persuing....
maybe I should stop as now I am hi jacking the thread, but could you ever envision.. pigment transfer done using a matrix type material and rolling on like dye transfer??
what I like about the gum process over carbon is the fact that the gum sinks into the palladium and is not a tissue layer on top... the relief is quite compelling once you build up the layers.
an assortment of pigments other than cmy only.
what was very interesting is when we started using opaque pigments in conjunction with a shadow only negative.. the result was nothing short of remarkable
We used blue over the palladium, basically a negative that only showed the deepest of shadows, so the dmax jumped right off the page, we also spent a lot of time with
the midtone negative which we added different pigments with some incredible shifts in print contrast and tonality very much worth persuing....
maybe I should stop as now I am hi jacking the thread, but could you ever envision.. pigment transfer done using a matrix type material and rolling on like dye transfer??
what I like about the gum process over carbon is the fact that the gum sinks into the palladium and is not a tissue layer on top... the relief is quite compelling once you build up the layers.