I am not an expert on this but I think that after the film has been exposed to light the latent image is much more sensitive to gamma rays, thus your fogged negs. If someone who knows better would clarify this it would be an interesting read.
Patrick
Vacuum-packaging the exposed film before put it again in the freezer could be a good idea. As for the fog it's the cosmic radiation, no one can do anything about it.
I think the "key" here is for film to have a long life (pre exposure), it needs to be in its sealed foil pouch. I have used 25 year old expired medium-speed b/w film that was sealed in its pouch, but not refrigerated, just stored in cool conditions, and had no visible fog.
Fair comment, and I wouldn't argue for an instant about printability, but what's 'visible' fog? There's always a base density and I wouldn't like to put a number on 0.10 (typical FB+F for roll-film), 0.20, 0.30 (typical FB+F for 35mm), 0.40 or 0.50 without a densitometer or a known comparison density.
Cheers,
R.
The 'fog' includes the area where the film sprocket holes are. It is uniform, over the whole film, not just the exposed area.
I am not an expert on this but I think that after the film has been exposed to light the latent image is much more sensitive to gamma rays, thus your fogged negs. If someone who knows better would clarify this it would be an interesting read.
Patrick
My understanding is that the latent image keeping properties of film (i.e. exposing, freezing, developing) are much worse than the stocking up and freezing keeping properties (i.e. freezing, exposing, developing) of film.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?