Steve Smith
Member
Depends on where you are. In my jurisdiction there is a tax due on everything, but it is only 1.4%, so for camera equipment it probably is relatively unimportant.
In the UK tax is only payable if the estate value exceeds a threshold of £325,000 and a 40% tax is then paid only on the value above that amount. According to Wikipedia 94% of estates escape from paying inheritance tax.
Here it isn't really the sort of thing we get lawyers involved in. We usually have one or two executors of the will who are normally family members. Once they have been granted probate they will deal with the sharing out of the estate in accordance with the will (if there is one). Some people do this via a lawyer but many do not as it isn't really necessary.
From earlier comments, it appears that the "Steves" here don't really appreciate us estate lawyers. I feel so hurt![]()
I'm certainly not 'anti lawyer'. In fact, I wish I had studied law myself as it is a subject which interests me quite a lot - especially contract law. Unfortunately I gained this interest a bit too late in life to go on and study it.
I suppose some of my apparent 'don't get a lawyer involved' attitude comes from the number of posts I see (usually on PhotoNet) about copyright infringement where the stock answer seems to be "you need to contact a lawyer" but usually in these cases any lawyer's fees would far exceed any gains to be made from pursuing the matter in this way. Copyright law isn't that complex and anyone with a bit of common sense should be able to work out the facts and a suitable method to prove ownership.
Sometimes when viewing the US from over here it seems that Americans consult either their lawyers or their psychiatrists before they do anything!
Steve.
Last edited by a moderator: