Fotospeed's fixer FX20 problem

Akki14

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2007
Messages
1,874
Location
London, UK
Format
4x5 Format
Does anyone use fotospeed's FX20 Rapid Fixer? The information on the package seems very very off for the fixing time. It says for 1+9 dilution the fix time should be 2minutes. Hubby tried this, opened his daylight tank up and found the film hadn't cleared so we had to use some of my old fortespeed fixer to clear it. I just did a test with a piece of leader and found it cleared in 5min30seconds, so I guess that means my "rapid fixer" has a safe fixing time of 11minutes??

Wondering if I should attempt complaining to Fotospeed about the problem. I thought maybe it was because the stuff in the bottle wasn't mixed up well so I gave it a good shake before measuring out the fix for the above test. The first time with hubby's film not clearing was without shaking the bottle before measuring out the fix.
 

Ryuji

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2005
Messages
1,415
Location
Boston, MA
Format
Multi Format
I'm not sure of the product-specific info, but did you make sure that you are not applying the processing instruction for papers to your film? Just checking.
 
OP
OP

Akki14

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2007
Messages
1,874
Location
London, UK
Format
4x5 Format
Absolutely sure. It says Film: 1+4 dilution 1minute, 1+9 dilution 2minutes. I just did another leader test with 1+4 dilution and it did clear in 30seconds to 1minute is about right for that but not for the bottle recommended 1+9 dilution.
 

Attachments

  • P4110020.jpg
    130.7 KB · Views: 100

Bob F.

Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2004
Messages
3,977
Location
London
Format
Multi Format
Odd. Twice the time for twice the dilution seems to be the usual recommendation for fixers. Those recommended times look a little short: a 30 second clear time would suggest that a one minute fix might be pushing your luck: I'd go for 3-4 times the clearing time (Ilford for example recommend a 2-5 minute fix for Hypam at 1+4).

Which film was it? Some such as Tmax need longer and I can see Tmax easily needing over 5 mins at 1+9.

I only ever use the low odour version, FX30, and then only at 1+4 so can't help from experience (it clears FP4+ in under 40s).

Cheers, Bob.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Ryuji

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2005
Messages
1,415
Location
Boston, MA
Format
Multi Format
That's surprising to me too... I think your best bet is to contact them and ask for their explanation. Please let me know what the true story is...

Also, you may find that the film may clear in fresh fix in 30 seconds, this is not going to be the same when the fixer is used. I am curious to hear whether their recommended procedure is valid for the last roll within their recommended processing capacity.
 
OP
OP

Akki14

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2007
Messages
1,874
Location
London, UK
Format
4x5 Format
The film I was testing for the dilutions (and the failed strip of negs) was Ilford HP5+. I never use Tmax nor anything t-grained to my knowledge; it's either ilford HP5+ or fomapan or lucky film, the last two being older type emulsions (as far as I know).
I ended up using it for 1min30seconds on Fomapan 400 and it at least cleared, dunno how long it was clear for, though since it was in tank closed up.

I did think it was a bit odd that 1+9 dilution would take so much longer to clear. Seems a bit strange but since it doesn't take twice the time that 1+4 takes, I think I will suggest to Fotospeed that they possibly change their labels to not recommend the 1+9 dilution for film.
 

Les McLean

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 18, 2002
Messages
1,606
Location
Northern Eng
Format
Multi Format
 

Ryuji

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2005
Messages
1,415
Location
Boston, MA
Format
Multi Format

I don't think there is any surprise in 1+9 taking much longer fixing time with film. I am not sure if their products use technology that is so unique to them, but I think most fixer manufacturers don't recommend dilutions higher than 1+4 for film. Film crystals are much harder to dissolve when the fixer is diluted.
 

gainer

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 20, 2002
Messages
3,699
Since agitation was not mentioned, I presume it was not a factor, but it's worth mentioning.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…