Fortepan 100 - nice!

Hello friends,

I just wanted to share with you my joy about new Fortepan 100. It came to Moscow, I shot a 120 roll, developed it for 14 min in homebrew Microphen 1+3, and... the results are excellent! The tonal scale is outstanding, and the film doesn't have this gloomy black look - the silver in it is brownish-black, but the negatives are printable on a normal grade paper. I posted some of my test pictures in Standart gallery - come and see, if you're interested.

Cheers from Moscow,
Zhenya

I have a 100 ft just out of date roll I bought a couple of months ago. I processed test rolls in Edwal 12 and D 777, the Edwal 12 at EI 50 do look good, the roll in D 777 were 2 stops under. I have a roll shot at EI 200 for acufine which I plan to process this weekend.

Well, none of your developers are sold in Moscow - but you can see how my own-made Microphen works. I didn't try to use it straight - in 1+3 version it's a pleasure I can say that this Forte 100 is not worse than any of Ilford films (though the film base is a bit too curvy ).

Paul Howell said:

I have a 100 ft just out of date roll I bought a couple of months ago. I processed test rolls in Edwal 12 and D 777, the Edwal 12 at EI 50 do look good, the roll in D 777 were 2 stops under. I have a roll shot at EI 200 for acufine which I plan to process this weekend.

Click to expand...

Acufine is a high energy developer similar to Micorphen, Micorphen pushes well you might want to experiment to see if you can push to 200 or even 400. I will let you know how I do with Acufine at 200. I have a gallon mix of Microphen somewhere and I might mix it up just to use with Forte 100. Once I use my roll I doubt that I will be able to get another. I keep promising my self that I wont buy anymore outdate rolls of film, but what can I say.

Yes, it looks like PanF+, but without too much of a contrast - and without deep black on negative, due to different silver grain size. Also, Forte 100 can be nicely reversal-processed - giving almost grainless transparencies, with soft gradation. A base fog is not a problem in my case, too. And it handles contrasts perfectly - I shot Oleg with a single light source, and see how well it prints! I wonder what Tmax would say in this situation... Your picture caught my eye that time - and now we can see that was not only to nice esprit, but thanks also to Forte

Cheers, Zhenya

[
QUOTE=jdef]I like Forte 100 very much. I shoot it in 120, in the form of Arista Edu. 100. I find it very similar in characteristics to Ilford Pan F+. It responds very well to the staining developers I use, and to PC-TEA. Forte 100 has a very clear base, so even shortdated/outdated film is probably useable, unless it's been stored poorly, or otherwise mistreated. At $1.29/roll from Freestyle, it's a bargain, and I've not had any problems with base fog. For 35mm shooters, Freestyle's repackaged Pan F+ is actually cheaper, at $17/100' roll. Both are excellent films. The attached image was shot on 120 Edu. 100, and developed in Hypercat to test the combo's ability to handle contrast in portraiture. The print looks much better than the scan.

Jay[/QUOTE]