Formulary TEA now 85%

Branches

A
Branches

  • 5
  • 0
  • 50
St. Clair Beach Solitude

D
St. Clair Beach Solitude

  • 10
  • 3
  • 151
Reach for the sky

H
Reach for the sky

  • 4
  • 4
  • 187
Agawa Canyon

A
Agawa Canyon

  • 4
  • 3
  • 228

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,892
Messages
2,782,652
Members
99,742
Latest member
lekhaiya
Recent bookmarks
0

ntenny

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
2,480
Location
Portland, OR, USA
Format
Multi Format
This might be old news, but I just opened a bottle of TEA from the Formulary (bought about a year ago), and the contents were much thinner than past batches. Previously, I’ve found their TEA very difficult to draw into a syringe, and this batch flowed right up, about like the old HC-110 syrup. My ascorbic acid also seemed to dissolve faster in it than I’m used to, but that may be just because the stirrer had an easier time spinning in the thinner medium.

Checking the SDS revealed that the Formulary now list their TEA at 85%, with the rest claimed to be diethanolamine. I’m pretty sure it used to be listed higher. I went ahead and mixed up a batch of PC-TEA as usual, and my test roll looks fine to the eye, but I wonder if there are photographic implications to this change. Has anyone done real testing on developers mixed with 85% TEA vs. higher concentrations?

-NT
 

John Wiegerink

Subscriber
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
3,659
Location
Lake Station, MI
Format
Multi Format
This might be old news, but I just opened a bottle of TEA from the Formulary (bought about a year ago), and the contents were much thinner than past batches. Previously, I’ve found their TEA very difficult to draw into a syringe, and this batch flowed right up, about like the old HC-110 syrup. My ascorbic acid also seemed to dissolve faster in it than I’m used to, but that may be just because the stirrer had an easier time spinning in the thinner medium.

Checking the SDS revealed that the Formulary now list their TEA at 85%, with the rest claimed to be diethanolamine. I’m pretty sure it used to be listed higher. I went ahead and mixed up a batch of PC-TEA as usual, and my test roll looks fine to the eye, but I wonder if there are photographic implications to this change. Has anyone done real testing on developers mixed with 85% TEA vs. higher concentrations?

-NT
The viscosity changes with temperature variations also.
 
OP
OP

ntenny

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
2,480
Location
Portland, OR, USA
Format
Multi Format
The viscosity changes with temperature variations also.

True. The temperature in my darkroom is very stable, though, and this is clearly much thinner than the old stuff in an apples-to-apples comparison.

-NT
 

dcy

Subscriber
Joined
May 9, 2025
Messages
480
Location
New Mexico, USA
Format
35mm
Checking the SDS revealed that the Formulary now list their TEA at 85%, with the rest claimed to be diethanolamine. I’m pretty sure it used to be listed higher. I went ahead and mixed up a batch of PC-TEA as usual, and my test roll looks fine to the eye, but I wonder if there are photographic implications to this change.

Well, I guess I won't be buying my next batch of TEA from PF. I do not have the energy to try and figure out if or how to adjust the PC-TEA recipe or the way I use it in order to compensate for adulterated ingredients. ArtCraft chemicals has TEA.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom