• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

For the rest of your life you could only have one camera.

Tompkins Square Park

A
Tompkins Square Park

  • 8
  • 0
  • 75
Siesta Time

A
Siesta Time

  • 2
  • 1
  • 57

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
202,860
Messages
2,846,706
Members
101,574
Latest member
JRSCollection
Recent bookmarks
0

Eric Rose

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 21, 2002
Messages
6,834
Location
T3A5V4
Format
Multi Format
What would it be? Currently I have a Cambo monorail, Linhof Tech IV, 3 x Nikon N90s, Nikkormat FTN, Nikon F5, Nikon D70s, Leica M5 and M3, Rollei TLR, Hassleblad 500C/M, and 2 x Olympus XA. Plus a full assortment of lens where applicable.

If I had to give up all my cameras and only have one for the rest of my photographic life (plus the lenses I already have for it). It's a toss up between the Blad, Nikkormat FTN and Linhof. As I get older weight will become an issue but there are ways to get around that with roller cases and tripods. Next availability of film could be an issue. Currently I probably have a life time supply of 4x5 film in the fridge. If need be I could stock up on MF. 35mm I think will be available for some time to come.

As I get older I take more time contemplating what I want to shoot and how I want to do it rather than just "working" a scene by taking loads of shots and then picking the best one from a set of contacts. So having fewer shots per shoot to develop would seem to knock out the 35mm, although I do bulk load and can roll shorter rolls. Ummm. As an example of this slower pace my last trip to Coos Bay and the Redwoods yielded 9 negatives to develop in LF and 2 rolls of 35mm.

From a just plain fun to shot perspective, for me at least, nothing beats the Blad. On the other hand while in the Redwoods last month, shooting the Linhof was almost a religious experience.

Any of the electronic cameras would be eliminated from the list immediately due to reliability issues. The F5 is a dream to use but I like cameras that don't need batteries. I still have a very good light meter that does not require batteries as well for those odd times when I actually need to take a reading.

It's tough but if I HAD to sell all my gear and just keep one "system" I would have to settle on the Linhof Tech IV. I have all the lenses I need, well maybe a 400mm telephoto would be nice, all the film I need and I can find the chemicals to develop etc fairly readily. Of course this latter issue would be common to all film formats I have considered.

I must admit however that I would have to cheat a bit and keep a least one digi p/s so I can take candids of my grandchild, family etc to share.
 
I think I would go with my 8x10. I agree with your idea of working a scene and I love the idea of a single sheet of film as a project. I no longer do snapshots or family photographs. Even tourist photography is less interesing to me these days although I do still love wandering around Manhattan with my RB67 every year or so. But the idea of shooting only a few negs and spending time getting a really good contact print really appeals to me.
 
I personally would keep my Hasselblad. It lets me wander farther from the car as I get older. 35mm is a pain to print, especially as my eyes get weaker. I want the quality of a larger format as well. I find I want to wander and look and respond to more pieces of a landscape than 4x5 will easily let me do. (But I ain't sellin' any of 'em yet!)

Peter Gomena
 
Have 4-35mm, a Mamyia 645,a Crown Grpaphic 4x5, 2-5x7's, 8x10, and a Ritter 7x11. If I could only have one, it would be the Ritter 7x11 (though it has a 8x10 back also). It just fits the way I see, and the way I like to work.
 
Wirelessly posted (BlackBerry9000/4.6.0.167 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/102 UP.Link/6.3.0.0.0)

Simple. Minolta XG-M. Had mine for 20 yrs and it fits like a glove.
 
For me....the M6 and funny enough..the Oly XA.
 
My Wista 4x5. It's the only LF camera I've ever owned and I've had it for about 28 years. Why consider another when this ones never let me down?

Murray
 
Any of the electronic cameras would be eliminated from the list immediately due to reliability issues. ... I like cameras that don't need batteries.

Well, I'm going to assume that if film and chemistry is still available, then batteries will be, too. I use the RB67 90+% of the time. But if faced with being restricted to one camera, I would probably chose my Fuji 645.
 
Do I really have to choose? Oh, gosh. My two favorites currently are: M645 and my OM2 w/auto bellows and 80mm macro system - I love them both. If it came down to macro and how close I could get I would choose the OM. But if not I would go with the M645. I can't make this decision. Ah, heck today I would go with M645, tomorrow the OM2.
 
Hmmm, probably go with the Crown Graphic or maybe, the RW45...
probably the Crown. It is just so much more versatile.
 
Nikon F3HP but if I could have a second camera, Pacemaker Speed Graphic 4x5. I own or have owned most all of the top cameras, however, these are my favorites.:D
 
I have two Nikons, N-75 and F-100, a Hasselblad 503 CX and a Hasselblad 903 SWC. Do I have to choose?

If so it would be between the F-100, a Hasselblad 503 CX and a Hasselblad 903 SWC.

Steve
 
I have two Nikons, N-75 and F-100, a Hasselblad 503 CX and a Hasselblad 903 SWC. Do I have to choose?

If so it would be between the F-100, a Hasselblad 503 CX and a Hasselblad 903 SWC.

Steve

But you didn't choose just one! Come on play the game, make the tough decision LOL.
 
Ebony 5x7
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No brainer, I have dozens of cameras but it would be my 141mm 4x5 Arca, I'm going to have it buried with me..Evan Clarke
 
For me it'll be either my RB67 or my Canon F1. Right now it is the RB67, but tomorrow could be a different story.

Jeff
 
If I had to live with only one camera, I would hang onto one of my 20 or so Minolta SRT's because it's compact, easy to use, and can double as a hammer. However, I would squirrel away the 'Dorff, Sinar, 2D, and a gob of B&J and Calumet LF's, the 'Blads, Mamiya 645's, Zeiss Super Ikontas, Kodak Panorams, etc. in storage until the day when I am allowed to bring 'em back out.
 
I'll agree with Eric Rose that from a "fun to shoot" perspective, nothing beats the Hasselblad. But ultimately, if I must limit photography to only ONE camera, I'll have to agree with Evan Clark.... the Arca 141 system is a dream come true.
 
I'm stomping around Sweden at the moment (currently Malmö), with my good ol' Rolleiflex, and my new Wista 4x5 field. The Rollei is a bit of a "safety net", but I'm having so much fun with the Wista, and can really see it being the one camera I'll "want" to use all the time!

Marc
 
An impossible choice! If I had to choose right now, and assuming continuing film supplies, I would probably take the Leica M6 (with tripod). 35mm is completely portable for all occasions. Maybe it's not MF, but the image quality is still pretty nice. It is quiet and discrete if necessary, and I am also happy lugging it on a 3-day hike. Ask me again tomorrow, and I would probably choose the 6x6...

Ian
 
Rolleiflex. No doubt.
Now the problem, which one? The 2.8 HFT Planar or the 2.8 Xenotar? I already know I can't decide, which is why I have both.
Dennis
 
But you didn't choose just one! Come on play the game, make the tough decision LOL.

Trouble maker!

If so it would be between the Hasselblad 503 CX and the Hasselblad 903 SWC. That is one brand, OK, eh?

Steve
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom