"For General Viewing".

vpwphoto

Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2011
Messages
1,202
Location
Indiana
Format
Multi Format
What do you think they meant in the old Senaca catalogs when describing a camera good for portraits and "for general viewing".

Sounds kinda corny like someone would set up the camera and just gaze at the ground glass at the neighbors or a vista across the river.

Just wondering... and perplexed.:confused:
 

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,103
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
Well, I have been asked if my 8x10 was a telescope (and a movie camera and a surveyor's transit), but, sigh, never a Hasselblad.

I guess I should just say am having a general look around...
 
Last edited by a moderator:

greybeard

Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2005
Messages
366
Location
Northern Cal
Format
Large Format
It is my understanding that in the early days of photography, the principal genres were "portraits" and "views", as in "A View of the Great Sphinx". Hence, "view camera" with less bellows and more portability than a studio camera, and a camera for "general views" might have been one not specialized for panoramas, or some other niche genre.

On the other hand, museums are full of pictures of doughty gentlemen in fancy uniforms, so maybe it was intended for only the most senior officers of the army.....
 

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,103
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
So a "private view" camera would be either a roughly made camera for the foot soldiers, or used to take naughty french postcard shots.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…