- Joined
- Jun 21, 2003
- Messages
- 29,832
- Format
- Hybrid
about time to what?
You know, so what? So what if it's all been done to death. That's very much like the argument many photographers advance about "there's no good pictures to be made in my own backyard- I must travel to exotic places to take good pictures". If the pictures you're making of trees, rocks, cars, buildings, birds, whatever, are looking the same as everyone else's, it's not for fault of the subject matter- it's a lack of creative vision and communication skills on the part of the camera operator.
You know, so what? So what if it's all been done to death. That's very much like the argument many photographers advance about "there's no good pictures to be made in my own backyard- I must travel to exotic places to take good pictures". If the pictures you're making of trees, rocks, cars, buildings, birds, whatever, are looking the same as everyone else's, it's not for fault of the subject matter- it's a lack of creative vision and communication skills on the part of the camera operator.
I don't think photography is dead. Maybe it is creativity that is? I know a lot of people that try to emulate other works only on trips and wonder why I haul a camera around my neighborhood. It is the same with my relatives' fascination with pinterest crafts, but never sitting down and making something on their own. It easier to follow in another's footsteps than strike out on your own.
Photography isn't dead. More photographs are made today than ever before. What is dead is making money from photographs.
People have been saying that for a long time. In fact, entire generations of people complaining that "it's all been done and over with" are now themselves dead and over with. Just ignore it. It's all been SAID before.
What is dead is making money from photographs.
What is dead is the idea that you can buy a camera, learn to use it reasonably well, put up a sign, and then still make money from Photography.
There are lots of people making a LOT of money from photography in this world, because despite what many people online will tell you it is still an important profession, and some clients are still willing to pay top dollar for specific work. It takes time, effort, and frequently lots of money to get strong and reliable returns from photography as a business, and excellent networking is key to actually getting the work.
If you are doing something that anyone who goes out and buys themselves the newest entry level dSLR and practices for a few months can do, then you're not in a great spot to really market yourself as something worth spending money on. However, if you're set up in a technical or highly specialized field? Well I've met one guy who is making a multimillion dollar company out of photographing radiation contaminated sites with a crew of three people working a few weeks of the year.
Money in photograph is out there, and at times tons of it, but no one is getting a dime of it for sitting on their couch instead of going out hunting for it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?