I tried with aperture from 4.5 to 16, the optimum exposure time is only 0.75-1.5 seconds.
Are there any fomaspeed variant user could share your experience?
I guess maybe the iso of fomaspeed is fast? So it called foma"speed".
Yes, today's paper is fast. Using multigrade filters helps since they add some density. A neutral density filter also works. If you have a color head, you can dial in neutral density by setting the three dials to the same number. 30 units is generally one stop.
Yes, today's paper is fast. Using multigrade filters helps since they add some density. A neutral density filter also works. If you have a color head, you can dial in neutral density by setting the three dials to the same number. 30 units is generally one stop.
As mentioned, most of the filters have effective neutral density built in (red). You can leave the #2 in place all the time if you control print contrast by other means. Also, you could try a 75W lamp.
I have an Opemus 5, I use a 75w bulb and get 3-5 s exposures without filtration for a 5x7 print at f/8 on Fomaspeed. So your times are about right, from my experience.
I usually split grade print with Foma's filters, they cut out more light than the Ilford filters, they (Foma's) lengthen the exposures by at least 2-fold.
I have an Opemus 5, I use a 75w bulb and get 3-5 s exposures without filtration for a 5x7 print at f/8 on Fomaspeed. So your times are about right, from my experience.
I usually split grade print with Foma's filters, they cut out more light than the Ilford filters, they (Foma's) lengthen the exposures by at least 2-fold.