- Joined
- Oct 11, 2006
- Messages
- 2,184
- Format
- Multi Format
If Foma quit film is because they are out of business. Their line of product is film for various applications and the chemicals to process it, I heard that their most important business is X-Ray film.
http://www.foma.cz/en/homepage
An hungarian page I found says that Foma has 300 employees.
X-Ray film is also used in weldings to evaluate porosity, normally in pipings, I don't know if digital imaging has arrived there already.
I can tell you most dentists here in Canada have gone to using digital sensors, mostly because of communication purposes with insurance companies. They also require about half the radiation dose of our most sensitive film. That being said, there are still holdouts - one of the dentists in my office still uses it. I wouldn't say the market is ready to collapse yet, but I can't see anybody still using it in 15 years.I havent seen an X-ray machine that uses film in many many years. I had thought that they had all gone digital by now. Surely that market is in a state of collapse too? Or are developing countries still using film here?
I hope they keep it this way. There's too much hype surrounding traditional products.My impression from discussions on the internet (which are not very common for this company) is that the company seems to be a bit reclusive in terms of reaching out and communicating with the community
There are many hospitals still using a “hybrid” process with X-Rays. Films are taken, digitized, and them promptly recycled. Eventually, these hospitals will go all digital, but currently these sensors are still very expensive.
They used a pretty large film(holder) to record the image. It's possible that they simply moved into this facility with their existing equipment, of course.
There may be some misunderstanding, but the process I described does actually use film. Many small hospitals still use film, especially with portable X-rays. I most recently worked in a hospital where this was the case. The main X-ray department did not use film. It was apparently more cost effective to maintain the development machine than to buy digital plates for each portable machine.This hybrid process does NOT use films. There are already NO consumables. The advantage though is that one still can use the old X-ray devices.
There may be some misunderstanding, but the process I described does actually use film.
I havent seen an X-ray machine that uses film in many many years. I had thought that they had all gone digital by now. Surely that market is in a state of collapse too? Or are developing countries still using film here?
actually the Digital Cassettes look like film holders, and are placed in a slot that Looks like a film processor, BUT actually contain a hybrid between a laptop computer screen and a phosphor grid. They are read out electronically and reset to an unexposed state. Since they are the same size and shape as a film holder, they can be used with existing x-ray units and only the reader device is changed. (replacing the film processor)
Actual X-ray film is likly still in demand for Non destructive testing where the film may be part of the documentation of the part being produced. Small clinics in remote areas may also find using film for the dozen shots that they might need a month might still be more cost effective than even one of the digital "cassette" systems.
Just travel to east europe countrys and break your leg ! Soon you will see such oldfashined machines in smaler local hospitals.I havent seen an X-ray machine that uses film in many many years. I had thought that they had all gone digital by now. Surely that market is in a state of collapse too? Or are developing countries still using film here?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?