At least in the USA Fomapan now costs almost as much as Ilford or Kodak so I hope the QC has increased as well. Even the Freestyle version, with no DX codes anymore, costs more than brand name Kentmere from B&H.
Don't get me wrong. I love Fomapan but when there are no second chances I'll use another brand with guaranteed results even if they are not the Fomapan "look" I like so much. I've not had QC issues with the last few years batches of Fomapan but if the prices are the same I'll just take the Ilford product for now.
Sort of true. It's true if you buy it branded "Foma." But if you buy the Freestyle "Arista.EDU Ultra" brand you get the same film and it's substantially less expensive than Kodak or Ilford.
I've used a bit of the 400 in 120 and 4x5 but not 35mm. I never saw any QC problems. I HAVE scratched it, because it's very soft when wet and much easier to scratch than Kodak or Ilford or Fuji, but once you know that careful handling prevents that problem.
What I really like with Foma films is the green vomit after pre-soak ;-)
Lets take photos only with Fomapan 200 and try to share them here.
We seem to have two contradictory posts here in Ricardo's and baachitraka. I presume that the green is the anti-halation dye? If so it is difficult to believe that it all comes out in a pre-wash or there is not even a trace of it if a pre-wash is avoided
There may be an explanation which reconciles these two seemingly contradictory statements but I wonder what it is?
Nice shots, Ricardo
pentaxuser
I only use 35mm, so no green tinge for me.
Richard,
Didn't they change the base layer for F200 in 120 a few years ago?
I knew there had to be a simple explanation and there it is. The added benefit is that I have learned something and we all remain friends, belonging as we do to the "Seekers of Wisdom and Truth Society" which has prevented any of us from wishing to delete our APUG account.I use nothing but fomapan, 200 and 400, in 120 the green is the anti halation layer, but only on 120, I don't use a pre wash, and the layer comes off mainly in the developer, turn my Rodinal a sickly shade of green, also turns my D76 a less vibrant green,
Richard
Can you back up what you said with perhaps samples of your work?
Has anyone developed Foma 200 in Barry Thornton's 2-bath?
thx
Drew, perhaps there is or was a problem with LF film, and I understand your point of view, but certainly in 120 or 35mm I have never had any problems, and I never use anything else, I must use 50 to a 100 rolls a year, and have done so since at least 2004, and never a problem, I admit I don't use LF, i prefer to carry a rollei to a 10/8, but so far all good,
Richard
Sort of true. It's true if you buy it branded "Foma." But if you buy the Freestyle "Arista.EDU Ultra" brand you get the same film and it's substantially less expensive than Kodak or Ilford.
I've used a bit of the 400 in 120 and 4x5 but not 35mm. I never saw any QC problems. I HAVE scratched it, because it's very soft when wet and much easier to scratch than Kodak or Ilford or Fuji, but once you know that careful handling prevents that problem.
I have and I've had very good results with it. I would offer to scan some but my scanner stopped working about a month ago. Give me a couple of days and I'll see if I can find someone to scan them for me.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?