probably in order to give you a correct aperture setting that takes into account the ambient lightwhy, in flash mode, it shows a shutter speed
probably in order to give you a correct aperture setting that takes into account the ambient light
The meter may mistake rapid changes in light levels (such as may occur due to meter movement) for flash light and measure accordingly. This is particularly likely to occur when taking reflected-light measurements. If this occurs, repeat the measurement using a sync cord.
Recalling the instructions by memory that accompany the Sekonic, I believe they also say something similar, which raises my original question. Why would the cord method lend itself to better accuracy than without it? The obvious answer that would spring to mind is whether the cord is "hot" during the entire duration of the flash. Or does the cord simply trip the flash and go "cold" again regardless of how long the flash may still be happening after its initial trip?My Minolta flash meter does that, and it will also show you percentages of ambient light and light from the flash.
I prefer using a sync cord with the meter, and it seems to be more reliable than using its flash standby mode. But either method should yield a good result, in theory.
The Minolta's manual includes this warning, which might be relevant to the OP's Sekonic;
And that was what also struck me as off from the beginning. Why would it give a shutter speed? The next post after yours speculates it may be to take into account ambient light. But a f/stop reading alone would also do that. So it makes no sense. The Sekonic instructions leave more questions than answers. But anybody who has ever experimented with one can see that something strange is going on once a certain brightness level of ambient light exists. The flash meter reading becomes non-sensical.I just replaced my ancient Luna ProF with a L 308S. I must agree, the meter is not as user friendly as my old Gossen. The main thing that makes no sense to me is why, in flash mode, it shows a shutter speed. Other meters I've used in flash mode simply show an aperture which makes perfect sense as (sync issues aside) shutter speed is irrelevant in flash work. I haven't used it with a cord but from my understanding all it does is allow you to do a test flash from a distance from the flash. On my old Gossen you could give multiple flashes and it would measure them all, (and give you an f stop for the total flashes) I suspect the L308S is doing the same thing in flash mode but the instruction book doesn't really make this clear. There are some Sekonic tutorials on youtube but they do not go into much depth.
I'm not familiar with your meter but I agree with your assunption that flash power changes the flash duration. my flashmeter(Gossen LunastarF2) works like yours with and without cord;never got it to work with the cordso, I just push the 'meter' button and it goes into a waiting mode where it waits for the flash to fire and then displays a rating mixing ambient and flash and does so very reliably.Therefore, I never had a need for using the cord.I'm trying to acquire complete understanding of the usage of the Sekonic L 308S as a flash meter. There's with cord and without cord. I do have some limited experience in using it to meter as a free-standing flash meter without attaching it to the flash. I can't say that I've been satisfied. It seems that once a certain flash duration or room brightness is reached, the meter becomes inaccurate, or makes no sense. At least that's my assumption. I've reasoned that perhaps some interaction between ambient light and the flash itself possibly confuses the meter. I don't know. I've never tried hooking it up to the flash with a cord and setting off the flash that way. Does doing so lend itself to better accuracy at metering the flash? Or does hooking up to the flash with the cord do nothing more than a simple remote trip button for the flash, with no actual other benefit? i suppose the question i'm asking is, does the flash duration actually get transmitted through the cord to the meter? It is agreed (by me) that any power adjustment in an electronic flash is not really changing the brightness of the flash, but only it's duration. Thank you.
If the flash is happening that fast, then that might pose a problem for your meter. Meters work by using some kind of photocell to convert light into electricity (or resistance or allow a transistor to conduct electricity). As such, there will always be some sort of slew rate associated with this action. They can only react so fast to changes in light. If the flash is flicking on and off before the meter can ramp up to get an accurate reading, then you'll have issues with inconsistency. You might have to set the flash to a higher power to get your reading, then calculate backwards to compensate for the lower flash settings. Either that, or use higher flash settings and either some kind of filter to reduce the power of the light coming off the flash, or set your lights further back and take advantage of the inverse square law (light power dimishes by half every time you double the distance). By doing either of the later, you wouldn't have to do any extra calculations, and could just go by what the meter says.Thanks for these answers. My brain is dense, but this info is slowly seeping in. My flash usage has only rarely been as "flash only". It's mostly always been a mixture of ambient and flash. Which now brings up the most important question of all. to preface it, my studio lights typically have a longer flash duration than the on-camera flashes with their strobo-eyes. The duration of the studio flashes and on-camera flashes in manual mode are closer to the duration to a flashbulb, which is quite long. But when hand-held or hot shoe mounted flash is used in automatic mode, then the duration can be very fast, like 1/70,000 of a second (to quote the old Honeywell Strobonar claims). And on my Sekonic, I have found that the readings are totally screwy when using flashes in auto mode. Of course I've only done it without the cord. So would using the cord fix this problem? As an aside, the doorbell analogy wasn't a very good one, as a doorbell button is hot as long as you have it pressed. Push one and see. First there's the "ding", but there's no "dong" till you let go.
Yes, I'm pretty sure that the 308S has a fault.My 308S works perfectly. Perhaps yours has a fault.
I'm not really sure why you would use a flash meter with a TTL flash. I don't know about the OP but I'm talking about using it with a standalone Elinchrome monolight .Also, if your flash is set to a newer TTL setting (like what digital cameras use), or red-eye reduction, it can give you false readings if the meter doesn't have a setting to compensate for this. In those settings, there's a preflash triggered just before the main flash to allow the camera to get a light reading of its own. If the meter mistakes that for the actual flash, it'll show every flash power setting as the same because it's not reading the actual flash, but instead the preflash.
The original TTL settings in film cameras don't use preflash. They meter the light reflected off the film and cut off the flash when they hit the nessesary amount of light. So flashes designed for film cameras won't have this issue, but newer ones made for digital cameras might if this feature is engaged.
People do, of course, sometimes use TTl capable flashes with cameras that don't offer TTl flash capabilities. I expect that Jim was merely suggesting that the OP check to make sure that the settings on the flash were appropriate.I'm not really sure why you would use a flash meter with a TTL flash. I don't know about the OP but I'm talking about using it with a standalone Elinchrome monolight .
I've never had a problem with the modeling light distorting a flash meter reading, but I expect that is because I've never had to deal with a modeling light that was anything less than many, many, many stops less bright than its accompanying flash.Here is my take on it. My old meter only metered flash in flash mode, it was as if the ambient mode was turned off during flash measurement, which, to my mind, is how it should be. I have never done much work that mixed ambient and flash so it was never a problem. My main question now with a meter like the L308S is this: if it is "helping" me deal with flash and ambient at the same time, does that mean it is being affected by the modelling lamp? If so that is crazy as the modelling lamp goes out when the flash is fired. My expectation of a flash meter is it tells me what aperture to use for a given flash output, if ambient light is present I can meter that separately and combine the two myself. Sometimes "improvements" in equipment are not well specified.
All this plus, wait for it, wait, wait - RTFM
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?