• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Fog

lensmagic

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
153
Format
Medium Format
Ansel Adams, in his book "The Negative" talks about "filmbase-plus-fog level" going up with a certain developing procedure, but he goes on to say that this (the fog) "is simply 'printed through' to achieve the desired black values in the print." But what are the advantages and disadvantages of "printing through" a negative with elevated fog?? Does fog affect contrast in any way?
 

Trevor Crone

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
546
Location
SE.London
Format
Multi Format
I wouldn't say there were any advantages. A small amount of development fog can indeed be easily printed through without any need to adjust contrast. Large amounts of fog will effect contrast and will need to be accounted for in the print.

Some developers, because of their composition are more prone to higher levels of fogging then others.

Retrainers are used to contain fogging, eg. Potassium bromide.

See Carroll's Photographic Lab Handbook.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
20,020
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
Generally one tries to minimize the fog level, because that's silver that could be used in the image, but if the film has enough density range, as most film does, you can just print through the base fog. It's more of a problem, though with alt processes, where elevated fog can seriously increase exposure times and you need all the density range the film can offer.

The only possible advantage might be if a little fog density pushes the shadows up the curve to improve shadow detail, sort of like flashing, but you would have to do some testing to see if that really works.

On prints no base fog is acceptable, so print developers usually include restrainers or anti-foggants to eliminate it.
 

Trevor Crone

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
546
Location
SE.London
Format
Multi Format
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
20,020
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
I agree, but just speculating on what the upside of base fog could possibly be, that was something that came to mind.
 

dancqu

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
3,649
Location
Willamette V
Format
Medium Format
David A. Goldfarb said:
I agree, but just speculating on what the upside of
base fog could possibly be, that was something
that came to mind.
Click to expand...

I've wrestled with that one; fb+f or pre-exposure.
Still do not have it in mind that they affect the image
in the same way. Pre-exposure effectively UPS the ISO
and so low values move up the curve. Fb+f clouds or
vails recorded low values so LOWERS the ISO. Dan
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register