sun of sand
Member
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2007
- Messages
- 601
- Format
- 4x5 Format
Foca Universal. Not quite top of their line, I guess
But it's the lenses that count.
I see some Willy Ronis photographs and they look nice but then the photos are what's nice
Lens/es do look pretty capable, though. Maybe not super sharp but then perhaps scale focused
Nice ethereal quality to em.
Anyone ever use one of these? Quality cameras they all say.
I finally took some Retina rolls to get developed at Wal-Mart
50 f2 Xenon
Did a comparison with 50 1.8 Zuiko and Hi-Matic 7s 45 f1.8 Rokkor on same roll
Rokkor is very nice
Xenon while not quite as sharp or contrasty as the other 2 is still damn sharp ...especially at closer focus, it seems. Not missing anything! It "glows/bleeds/flares" a bit in the highlights, too. Not quite as Summar "retro" as I had hoped but perhaps with other subject material.
Rangefinder is dim.. not very contrasty. It will see a lot of use, though.
But it's the lenses that count.
I see some Willy Ronis photographs and they look nice but then the photos are what's nice
Lens/es do look pretty capable, though. Maybe not super sharp but then perhaps scale focused
Nice ethereal quality to em.
Anyone ever use one of these? Quality cameras they all say.
I finally took some Retina rolls to get developed at Wal-Mart

50 f2 Xenon
Did a comparison with 50 1.8 Zuiko and Hi-Matic 7s 45 f1.8 Rokkor on same roll
Rokkor is very nice
Xenon while not quite as sharp or contrasty as the other 2 is still damn sharp ...especially at closer focus, it seems. Not missing anything! It "glows/bleeds/flares" a bit in the highlights, too. Not quite as Summar "retro" as I had hoped but perhaps with other subject material.
Rangefinder is dim.. not very contrasty. It will see a lot of use, though.