Depends totally on the intensity of the light source and its angle to the camera back.My students mostly use ISO 100/200 color film. So essentially, not really a problem if film door closes nice and snug?
My feeling is that the manufacturer installed the foam seals for a reason, and if you want to assure yourself against light leaks, you should replace them. They are inexpensive and easy to install.
I have replaced FG seals with soft adhesive felt (they also have a hard type that doesn't compress well) from Dick Blick. The one seal that doesn't work well for this is the one next to the hinge (maybe a narrower strip than what they used, farther from the hinge would be a good idea). For the channels, the felt was fine, though. I remember someone mentioning black yarn would also work, but you'd need some small amount of some adhesive.
I don't know if they're necessary, but Nikon seemed to think so. Certainly my Leicas seem to have a lot less light trapping than the FG.
According to the web site but I could not find any at the store closest to me that showed to have it in stock.velvet ribbon is stocked at JoAnn fabrics.
Felt and yarn were used before foam was available. I replace foam light seals with yarn and velvet, and foam mirror buffers with felt. I have no problems with lint, the oldest is a Nikon F done in '98.You probably don't want felt or yarn (!) unless you like lint from wear accumulating on your film. Probably.
Yes. Sover Wong states that an F2 is light tight without foam, but not dustproof.Foam also prevents excess dust from entering the camera.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?