Flaring Summicron- shade or exchange?

Carved bench

A
Carved bench

  • 0
  • 3
  • 56
Anthotype-5th:6:25.jpg

A
Anthotype-5th:6:25.jpg

  • 6
  • 4
  • 115
Spain

A
Spain

  • 2
  • 0
  • 90
Nothing

A
Nothing

  • 2
  • 3
  • 172

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,053
Messages
2,768,968
Members
99,547
Latest member
edithofpolperro
Recent bookmarks
1

Adrian D

Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2008
Messages
38
Location
Chester, UK
Format
Multi Format
Hello all.

I have been using a 50mm f2 summicron (about 10yrs old, coatings and glass in excellent condition) on my M6, and though it is an outstanding lens for picture quality, I get really frustrated with its tendency to flare. I have read that this can be the case with these lenses, but what can be done to lessen this effect? The retractable integral lens hood seems to be for the most part ineffective. I have been wondering about two options:

1- is there a more effective lens hood available for this lens ( I have the hood which fits a 35mm summicron and my older collapsible summicron, but it doesn't fit this particular model!)

2- What would I gain by exchanging it for a late collapsible f2.8 Elmar? I don't mind so much about losing a stop of speed, and I like the collapsible concept. Is this lens a better performer in the flare department?

Many thanks, looking forward to your thoughts

Adrian
 

Uhner

Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2006
Messages
1,100
Location
Oslo, Norway
Format
Multi Format
Adrian, can you describe the situations in which your lens is susceptible to flare?

I have the same model, with retractable lens hood, and mine only shows objectionable flare in strongly backlit situations with the sun just outside the image. Otherwise it is quite resistant to flare.
 
OP
OP

Adrian D

Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2008
Messages
38
Location
Chester, UK
Format
Multi Format
Hi Uhner, that is also the case with mine, but it does seem overly sensitive to any area of brightness in the frame, unlike my other, older collapsible summicron, which just appears a generally softer lens. The flare has the look of a bright foggy cloud towards the centre of the frame, not always the same size or in exactly the same position, which I could understand if there was some disfigurement in the glass, but there is not!


I am interested to hear from anyone who uses the f2.8 Elmar just to see how it compares.
 

Philippe-Georges

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 11, 2005
Messages
2,659
Location
Flanders Fields
Format
Medium Format
I have the older, 7 elements, Summicron and it flares only in strongly backlit situations, just like Uhner says, but very often when used whit out the hood.
I heard that the retractable hood is not so good as the former,vented, one...

Philippe
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,244
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
My Summicron is from about 1960, I don't ever remember it flaring, but then I probably haven't shot straight into the sun with it. It doesn't flare with stage lights. I always use the lens hood.

Lens flare's quite strange ,shooting directly into the sun with a 25 year old LF lens recently I had no flare while a modern Zoom was unusable.

Ian
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Arvee

Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2006
Messages
976
Location
Great Basin
Format
Multi Format
Take a close look through the lens off camera at a bright source and you may possibly have some shiny surfaces inside the lens. I have seen this in other lenses where the flat black lacquer was reflecting/bouncing light internally.

Fred
 

Steve Bellayr

Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2006
Messages
137
Format
35mm
You should have a shade on the lens regardless. When shooting into the sun or at sunset flare will occur more frequent than appreciated. It is hard to tell with a rangefinder as you are not looking through the lens. Though I am not certain about SLRs either. I shot a role of sunsets not long ago with a really good Leica lens about 3 of the lot had flare. It is just the angle.
 

weasel

Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2006
Messages
171
Format
Medium Format
Is it possible that there is some internal haze/dust/dirt stuff that needs to be cleaned? I had a lens on retina that flared quite badly; it looked clean and good, until I got out a flashlight, shined it through it and really looked. There was a subtle haze on the internal elements that once cleaned mostly fixed the flare issue.
 

Chaplain Jeff

Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2008
Messages
172
Location
Norfolk, VA
Format
35mm RF
Hello,

I have the Summicron DR 50mm, f/2 and use the vented lens hood. With the hood I have no issues whatsoever.

I would agree with the suggestion to call Leica. If you're getting the same haze in multiple pictures - and you say it's a new lens? - then Leica should take a look at it for you and fix it if necessary.

Jeff M
 

Jim Jones

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Messages
3,740
Location
Chillicothe MO
Format
Multi Format
A rectangular vented Canon hood works well on my old 50mm Summicron. I have no experience with modern 50mm f/2.8 Elmars, but the early one I tested was even sharper than the Summicrons. The test didn't include flare, though.
 
OP
OP

Adrian D

Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2008
Messages
38
Location
Chester, UK
Format
Multi Format
Thank you all

Thanks for everyone's contributions here. I seem to have solved the problem in the main by acquiring a (non-Leica!) screw-on lens hood for a few pounds on ebay- I hardly get the problem now. It does seem to do a better job than than the retractable hood in the lens.

Thanks for all your comments.

Adrian
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom