Please excuse the digitally manipulated attachements. They are intended as a way to emphasise the point of this post.
I have an old @ 1860's Petzval lens with no waterhouse stop. There are two unusual things about this lens...
a) a slot on the left hand side of the lens hood has been cut to allow stops to be put in (front of lens style)
b) The lens which is around 55mm wide in the glass, has a chip in the inside of the inner rear element which is around 5mm in diameter, but right at the edge. As installed in the lens right now, this chip is positioned at the bottom right (around 5 O'Clock if viewed from the rear)
So here is the problem...I get unusual flare from this lens. It appears to come from the bottom in a positive image, and is shaped as a crescent (see the highly contrasted images below that show clearly where the flare is). Clearly these images are exagerated, but I wanted people to see the shape and exact location of where the low contrast is occuring. Please also note the white area at the top is the tree line and not flare.
Now given the chip is at the bottom of the rear element, and with all my knowledge of how lenses work and especially Petzvals, I am loathe to think the chip is causeing this, since given it is at the bottom...would the flare not then appear at the top of the image? If everyone agrees with that assesment (I am open to being convinced otherwise), then the only possibility is the cut out in the hood (or maybe how big the hood is?) Since the cut out is located on the side (my left as I look at these images, Why would the flare appear so uniform centrally is the next question?...I would have expected a flare that ran from side to side....not so? The other wierd thing is that the Flare looks like is just fixed there...i.e. as I get in closer, it is just like magnifying it to a larger size, but it's the same shape in the same location??
I am working around it at the moment, and actually quite enjoy using the lens, but would love to understand what I am missing here, and if there is a way to remove it, then I would like that at my disposal! I intend to shoot a few plates this weekend to understand a little more...but that is a very time consuming way to work it out...;-)
For reference the lens is an 8in f3.8 Petzval and these plate sizes are 8x10.....for a real view of the flare effect, you will find the image marked xx in my gallery...
Appreciate any help that can be given.
Rgds, Kal
I have an old @ 1860's Petzval lens with no waterhouse stop. There are two unusual things about this lens...
a) a slot on the left hand side of the lens hood has been cut to allow stops to be put in (front of lens style)
b) The lens which is around 55mm wide in the glass, has a chip in the inside of the inner rear element which is around 5mm in diameter, but right at the edge. As installed in the lens right now, this chip is positioned at the bottom right (around 5 O'Clock if viewed from the rear)
So here is the problem...I get unusual flare from this lens. It appears to come from the bottom in a positive image, and is shaped as a crescent (see the highly contrasted images below that show clearly where the flare is). Clearly these images are exagerated, but I wanted people to see the shape and exact location of where the low contrast is occuring. Please also note the white area at the top is the tree line and not flare.
Now given the chip is at the bottom of the rear element, and with all my knowledge of how lenses work and especially Petzvals, I am loathe to think the chip is causeing this, since given it is at the bottom...would the flare not then appear at the top of the image? If everyone agrees with that assesment (I am open to being convinced otherwise), then the only possibility is the cut out in the hood (or maybe how big the hood is?) Since the cut out is located on the side (my left as I look at these images, Why would the flare appear so uniform centrally is the next question?...I would have expected a flare that ran from side to side....not so? The other wierd thing is that the Flare looks like is just fixed there...i.e. as I get in closer, it is just like magnifying it to a larger size, but it's the same shape in the same location??
I am working around it at the moment, and actually quite enjoy using the lens, but would love to understand what I am missing here, and if there is a way to remove it, then I would like that at my disposal! I intend to shoot a few plates this weekend to understand a little more...but that is a very time consuming way to work it out...;-)
For reference the lens is an 8in f3.8 Petzval and these plate sizes are 8x10.....for a real view of the flare effect, you will find the image marked xx in my gallery...
Appreciate any help that can be given.
Rgds, Kal