Not any more, benefit-wise. Nearly all the classic graded papers are long gone; and in the meantime, VC papers have dramatically improved and dominate even the top tier niches. I have two true additive narrow-band RGB colorheads, a conventional CMY colorhead 8X10 enlarger, and an 8X10 enlarger equipped with a high-output Aristo V54 blue-green cold light, plus the option of split printing with any of them using hard blue versus hard green glass filter over the lens. I can achieve nearly identical results with any of the above methods with any current brand of VC paper. No problem at the extremes of very low or very high contrast either, although very very few of my negs are far enough off in proper developed density to need that kind of beating half to death.
Kasper - Zone System officially standardized to Grade 2 paper? Nope, that's nonsense. Certain gurus did try to codify their own particular tweak on it standardized to Gr 2, or bully that opinion into position, but the whole point of the ZS was that it could be highly personalized and matched to your own film development regimen. I ordinarily only kept Grade 3 paper on hand, and many others did the same thing; but grades differed somewhat brand to brand, and the really good papers had enough flexibility in them to leverage them one grade either way, depending on the amount of development.
Now even talking about grades in reference to VC paper usage seems archaic, redundant, and counterproductive. VC allows a full continuum.