First world solution #1: dictate a description of the photo and the equipment used into your smartphone.
First world solution #2: Use a digital camera and lens system that automatically records metadata for each shot.
I actually use an F6 a lot. I like my FM3A more. It's my go-to since I got it, and have been trying an F3, but when I'm experimenting the F6 writes exif data. I specifically got it because I started back on film with medium format and when I have that giant beast out people always talk to me while I'm working. With the distractions, I was forgetting to record things when shooting. With the F6 I can box an exposure to learn how a film stock reacts, for instance, and be super lazy about writing anything down.
I'd like another F6, but holy geez did they dry up in the used market after I bought mine. First world problems right there.
Judging from the attitudes of a lot of analog photographers, someone who uses even a Hybrid workflow is close to a turncoat.
Yes, that seems to be the case. But I contend that isn't the opinion of anyone worth listening to. The No True Scottsman fallacy is just an absolute favorite of internet autists and self appointed gatekeepers. And thirteen year olds trying to act cool, I guess.
I shoot film only because I want to. I don't have room to build a darkroom where I can print my own, but I wanted to use film again, so I'm hybrid. A local place makes lovely prints when I want to see something for reals. And I enjoy doing it. Once we reach the fact that I am doing what I enjoy for my hobby, I'm not sure why the opinion of anyone on the subject of whether or not my art is done using their methods matters.