First tlr caméra advice

Cholentpot

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2015
Messages
6,743
Format
35mm
But how could anyone forget the Gowlandflex?

View attachment 364625

I like that it's "compact" - yet bigger than her head.

I was about to say, that's some 'compact' camera. Feel like he should have just made them progressively bigger, lean into the massive size rather than pare it down.
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,682
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
And there was a 5X7 and 8X10 version. I think only 2 or 3 8X10 were made. In the 60s when in college we got tour of the L.A Playboy studio, they had a 4X5 Gowlandflex.
 

hoomuzzz

Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2024
Messages
32
Location
China Mainland
Format
Multi Format
How about those with f2.8 lenses? Olympusflex, Fujicaflex, Rollop Automatic, Rocca Automatic… Maybe not very suitable for newcomers, but still worth a try (Olympusflex is very cheap).

There're also some made-in-China models such as Seagull, which is simpler, cheaper and easier to maintain.

I personally will take Yashica mat-124G for daily use and Yashica 635 for fun. They're easy to find and sometimes bargains.

I have 3 advice on the first TLR:
– Have a basic model as a start, then upgrade to a better one later.
– Find a more recent model than an earlier one, since they're easier to use or maintain.
– Look for a rather popular model, or mass-produced ones.
 
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Messages
2,193
Location
Mars Hill, NC
Format
Multi Format
But how could anyone forget the Gowlandflex?

I bought @Sean ’s Gowlandflex ages ago. It’s a sweet camera, and handholdable — but hardly svelte. Melanie shoots it all the time now.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4166.jpeg
    815.7 KB · Views: 68
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Messages
2,193
Location
Mars Hill, NC
Format
Multi Format

The 80/2.8 lenses are not optimal — they are bigger and heavier than the 75/3.5 lenses that are the more natural fit for the camera design.

There are a lot of really good TLR options out there, many of which have been mentioned here, and a few that have not. The Czech Flexorets, for example, are good cameras, and French Semflexes hold their own. But all of them are copies, in one way or another, of the Rolleiflexes and Rolleicords. (The exception being the Voigtlander Superb, which was designed as the antiRolleiflex.)

Twenty years ago, when Rolleis cost an arm and a leg, there was a rationale for buying a knockoff. But now you can buy a decent Rolleicord for about the same price as an imitator, and a good Rolleiflex MX can be had for a hundred more.

The difference in quality is palpable. (“Haptics,” someone else said upthread.) FWIW I would get a Rollei.
 
Joined
Jan 28, 2023
Messages
1,147
Location
Wilammette Valley, Oregon
Format
35mm RF

I got my Rolleiflex Automat from a friend for $75. Excellent camera.
 

anta40

Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2015
Messages
91
Location
Jakarta, Ind
Format
Multi Format

Mat 124 is fine. I own a 124g, which is think is also fine. Yes it feels a bit plasticky but as long as it delivers nice images, not a problem for me.

Mamiya TLRs are definitely greats option once you are commited into 6x6 format (I have the C3 with the 80/2.8 lens). Bulkier setup, though. Pick something lighter like the Yashica.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,902
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
I bought @Sean ’s Gowlandflex ages ago. It’s a sweet camera, and handholdable — but hardly svelte. Melanie shoots it all the time now.

Is the dog in the background thinking:
"My Dog, that camera is big!"
 

lejaune

Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2024
Messages
8
Location
East Coast, USA
Format
35mm
As far as the "plasticky" feel of the YashicaMat 124G, it's more due to its plastic coating over metal. I have both a 124G and a Rolleicord III. The 124G is actually heavier than the all metal Rolleicord, 1030g vs 852g. The black plastic coat/paint also makes it less cold to touch in winter shooting.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…