The message is right on, but the venue selected is talking to the already committed. Ad should be placed in a mass media publication for more bang for the buck.
Same as on their facebook,I agree with you, but I am stumped as to how they would proceed when much of the public thinks that film no longer exists. What is their message?
I can't quite read the small print on the ad.
Do I assume correctly that this is a Kodak Alaris ad?
I agree with you, but I am stumped as to how they would proceed when much of the public thinks that film no longer exists. What is their message?
I don't think they are trying to win over consumers to film. Rather, Kodak is trying to get a better share of the film market.The message is right on, but the venue selected is talking to the already committed. Ad should be placed in a mass media publication for more bang for the buck.
Well the message I get from the advert is that KA is at least as much trying to initiate greater use of film as much as it is trying to persuade existing film users to switch to Kodak.I don't think they are trying to win over consumers to film. Rather, Kodak is trying to get a better share of the film market.
Look at the medium: an analog photo magazine. Plus, the ad is signed Kodak Professional--hardly a division going after the consumer market.Well the message I get from the advert is that KA is at least as much trying to initiate greater use of film as much as it is trying to persuade existing film users to switch to Kodak.
Simply trying to win over existing Fuji or Ilford customers( Kodak's only serious volume rivals) as a sole objective seems to make less sense to me
pentaxuser
Simply trying to win over existing Fuji or Ilford customers( Kodak's only serious volume rivals) as a sole objective seems to make less sense to me
Look at the medium: an analog photo magazine. Plus, the ad is signed Kodak Professional--hardly a division going after the consumer market.
I think the copy is meant to appeal to the reader's nostalgia of when they possible grew up shooting film, or the imagined good times of the 50's as expressed in the overall look of the ad. Once again, the general public, and most probably the majority of digital-only photographers, is not likely to pick up a magazine that says on its cover, "The entire world of analog photography."They need to participate in a growing market. Someone out there TODAY is using a film camera for the first time. The often maligned, but profitable Lomography, recognizes this. I hope KA recognizes this. Happily for KA, Lomography sells not only its rebranded film, but also Kodak film.
Ilford at least has a series of youtube videos aimed at first time film users. Lomography gets youtube channels to say this episode is sponsored by Lomography by given the channel as little as a single roll of film (processed at the youtuber's expense!). These are the videos first film users watch.
At KA's demise. Although it is signed Kodak Professional, the image and text of the ad suggest to me that KA is going after consumers. (I hope so anyway.)
the ad is signed Kodak Professional--hardly a division going after the consumer market.
This is great. They should advertise in Brides magazines. People who are growing up today won't have a record of their childhood. I've got perfect 60 year old Kodachrome slides.View attachment 231270
!Back in the golden days of film, Kodak spent a huge amount of money advertising its products.
But with the onset of digital, the amount of ads for Kodak’s film range has dwindled, apart from online.
But that might be about to change.
The latest international edition of PhotoKlassik International magazine, a German magazine aimed at film photography enthusiasts, sports a back-page ad that takes you right back to the days when film was king, queen and every extended member of the royal family.
The ad features a graphic showing a family driving past one of the old “drive through” Kodak-branded kiosks common in US tourist spots in the 1960s and 60s. It says: “Add a special ingredient to your days out… Shoot film and relive your memories for generations!”
“Our contact with Kodak started at the PhotoKina 2018 when we launched the Inaugural issue,” editor Marwan Mozayen told Kosmo Foto. “And the business and sales departments were quite interested. They were very open and we could start with a lot of interviews with the people responsible for the Ektachrome manufacturing.
“And then suddenly they decided to advertise and we started to discuss this with them. What I know was that this specific ad was created during the time we discussed the ad.”
Could this be the start of a new raft of Kodak adverts urging photographers to trade pixels for Portra, Tri-X and Ektar? Given the very promising news about increasing film sales from the likes of Kodak and Ilford Photo recently, that might not be a bad idea."
https://kosmofoto.com/2019/09/kodak...KCzT5XA9ww_r4ajdiUpV2ZVay6QmvwPjwiOyk_DZor_AM
https://www.lynda.com/Filmmaking-tutorials/Creating-video-village/129023/519480-4.htmlWhat is a Digital Village for filmmaking and what makes it expensive?
I think the copy is meant to appeal to the reader's nostalgia of when they possible grew up shooting film, or the imagined good times of the 50's as expressed in the overall look of the ad. Once again, the general public, and most probably the majority of digital-only photographers, is not likely to pick up a magazine that says on its cover, "The entire world of analog photography."
I agree with you, but I am stumped as to how they would proceed when much of the public thinks that film no longer exists. What is their message?
Damn sight better to see an ad like this in a magazine like that than the gimmicky clothing and crap they’ve been trying to do. It demonstrates they might be getting a clue about today’s market
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?