Yeah, that is weird. Almost looks light struck??? You have good chemistry, otherwise there wouldn't be good images on the rolls. I've had blotches when film touches. I've never fiddled with the Cinestill stuff. You split your chemistry so the first didn't effect the second batch? ?
If it was developer that was mixed weird or contaminated it should be a uniform stain or effect . My only guess is some kind of problem loading the film onto the reels, or a really weird light leak in the tank, or when you were loading the reels. Your all natural hemp oil shampoo may be stronger than you think
Sometimes you never figure out exactly what is going on. I would start with fresh developer, opening the tank after fixer is fine. I use stop bath for color printing RA-4 but you shouldn't need for C-41.
I'm assuming you are using Kodak Flexicolor Developer, bleach, fixer and final rinse. That's as good as it gets chemistry wise.
Yeah, I can load 2 rolls of 120 onto a Jobo reel but it's a royal pain, even with my IR goggles. I've done it with Paterson in the past ,but I trimmed the film ends and taped the two films together ,still a pain.
The stop bath is fine. Shouldn't have caused any problems. In C41 minilab machines film goes directly into the bleach from developer, not even a rinse. Then fixer, then three countercurrent stabilizer baths. No wash at all. This is the C-41 RA process takes about 7 minutes total.Hrm, it's entirely possible that I had some sort of accidental exposure and didn't notice, which would be sort of a relief. I hate losing the shots but at least it would be unrelated to my development procedure. I literally just did 3 rolls yesterday, including another roll of the Cinestill (in 35mm) and they came out fine.
I read somewhere that the stop bath helps extend the life of the bleach (maintaining the ph) by neutralizing the alkaline developer, and I had an acetic acid based stop on hand, so I figured I'd use it. Do you think it could cause problems, or it just not necessary?
Thanks for the help!
The stop bath is fine. Shouldn't have caused any problems. In C41 minilab machines film goes directly into the bleach from developer, not even a rinse. Then fixer, then three countercurrent stabilizer baths. No wash at all. This is the C-41 RA process takes about 7 minutes total.
You can avoid stabilizer all together with washing, but you really do need the Kodak Flexicolor final rinse, it's fancy photo-flo that contains a biocide to keep the wee beasties from munching on the gelatin on your processed film. Not sure what bleach you are using but this stuff is what minilabs use. It works fine in small tanks and lasts forever, cuts the bleach time to 1 minute
https://www.uniquephoto.com/product/kodak-flexicolor-ra-c-41ra-bleach-replenisher-nr-for-color-negative-film-8255549/_/searchString/flexicolor bleach
If you are doing by the book it requires a starter, like the LU Flexicolor Developer. (Not the same starter) Unique photo is great because they break up cases so you don't need to buy 20 gallons at a time. For 125 bucks Unique will sell you enough Kodak C41 Flexicolor chemistry to develop a boat load of film, if you replenish stuff goes a very long way. The bleach is the only expensive part and it lasts forever. Developer is cheaper than black and white developer.
you really do need the Kodak Flexicolor final rinse, it's fancy photo-flo that contains a biocide to keep the wee beasties from munching on the gelatin on your processed film.
Because developed normal (non-chromogenic) black and white negative film is made up of silver in gelatin, and silver is itself an excellent bactericide.Why isn't it required for B&W film?
Yeah, what Matt said. Silver is been used as an antimicrobial for decades. There is a proprietary stainless steel treatment called Agion which is sold as a way to prevent mold and odors in air handling systems etc. Silver nitrate solution has been used as eyedrops for newborn babies to prevent any bacterial infections from the birth "process"Why isn't it required for B&W film?
Yup, I think so too. The green cast suggests that it was warm light, eg tungsten. Was a changing bag used to load the film into reels?looks like a light leak, not a development issue. the blobs would be more uniform if that was the case.
Kind of a coincidence, more than one faulty film of entirely different suppliers and types, with the same kind of fault, with the only commonality being that they were processed by the same person.
Nah, one of the c41 rolls also is affected, see the photo. Looks to be the same problem, but just not as bad.Hmm, the way I read it is that only the Cinestill is affected, or at least unexplained.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?