• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

First attempt in 20+ years with B&W film

DaveO

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 17, 2010
Messages
108
Location
Crossville,
Format
Medium Format
I just got back my negatives from a roll of T-Max 100 today. Haven't shot b&w in over 20 years so I did screw exposures up on things in the shade. This is a stone bridge built by the Civilian Conservation Corps in the 1930's. This was taken with a Nikon FM2n with a Zeiss 50mm ZF lens.
 
Last edited:
Just a beginner (me).....but that sure looks good...exposure and composition.
Like riding a bike I suppose......does that mean you have only been using color for the last many years.?
 
Last edited:
Isn't fit fun?
 
Your exposure was spot-on with this example, Dave. Just keep in mind this truism, which is the case with print film in general: it can handle overexposure much better than underexposure. So, when shooting in the shade, keep this in mind. If shutter speeds got too slow and you don't have a tripod handy, you can use a flash to open up the shadows and get the shutter speed back up to a decent hand-holdable speed.


So, now that you've had some success with B&W, the next step for you will be to do your own developing -- of course. Developing B&W is just about easier than falling off a log. You don't need a lot of gear to do it and you can scan your negs and take the scans down to most any place for prints -- if your printer can't handle photo paper, that is. Or you can do the whole wet darkroom thing and get yourself an enlarger -- but that's starting to go off the deep end, requiring a commitment that not everyone is willing to go for.
 
That's my story too, Dave. 'Fell back in love w/ mono. 'About 10 rolls in the last 3wks. Have a blast. Those here seem to drip good will & good help. 'Glad you're having fun. 'Hope to see more images.
 
Welcome back, daveO. That's better than anything off my first several rolls.
 
Heck of a bridge, and more heck of a photograph! Can't imagine what is screwed up exposure, but it sure looks great to me. The @cooltouch truism above is best rule that has worked for me.
 
This exposure of the bridge was pretty close to right on. I just darkened it slightly. The ones that were badly exposed were old homes that were in the shade of huge trees and were very underexposed.