Filter use

rowghani

Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Messages
268
Format
Med. Format RF
Hey guys so I have a general question about filter usage when making prints. A friend of mine taught me that as you move up the filters, more light will be blocked and therefore you have to increase your exposure. I don't really find this to be the case until I reach filter # 4. What are other people's thoughts on this? The jump from 3.5 to 4 seems to be almost always 1/8 or 1/4 of a stop for me.
 

grahamp

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
1,716
Location
Vallejo (SF Bay Area)
Format
Multi Format
That could be confusion with the two ways a colour head can emulate filters. The fixed grade filters do have a speed step above 3.5. I would think 1/4 stop is not enough, myself, but there may be other variables in the mix. Judge by results! It can appear that some filters are getting more dense, but the paper has different sensitivities to your eyes.

With colour head emulation of filters you can either match the colour only (variable exposure times), or match the colour and add some neutral density to get standard exposure times. Even then, most people accept the speed step at G4+ in the interests of shorter exposures in the more normal mid-grades.

Ilford do publish relative exposure details for their filters.
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
20,024
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
Interestingly I noted last night that while my Ilford MGII filters seem to get denser ( more magenta looking) up to grade 3/3.5 the grade 4 filter is distinctly lighter and more yellowish looking and the increase in exposure is almost nothing. Grades 4.5 and 5 are more dense than 4 and again are magenta looking but do not appear denser than 3 or 3.5.

It may be that my grade 4 filter has faded badly but even the 4.5 and 5 filters add very little in terms of exposure as measured by my analyser's probe. Probably a similar increase to the OP. However it may be that the eye is deceived and double exposure is required.

Does anyone here still use MGII filters and if so can they say if their set is as per my description. Equally can anyone who has the latest set of Ilford filters confirm that they get progressively darker?

I do not want to hijack the thread but answers to my questions may be relevant to the OP, assuming of course that he too has Ilford filters.

It might help if he were to confirm that his filters are Ilford as well. It sounds as if they are Ilford but confirmation will help.

pentaxuser
 
OP
OP

rowghani

Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Messages
268
Format
Med. Format RF
hey guys yup they are ilford filters and I have been given the recommendation to increase by a stop going from 3.5 to 4. thanks for all the responses.
 

dpurdy

Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2006
Messages
2,675
Location
Portland OR
Format
8x10 Format
I just bought a brand new set a few days ago and on the package it states:

ILFORD MULTIGRADE filters can be used above or below the lens...
The whole numbers correspond approximately to the contrast grades obtained with ILFORD graded papers.
Filters 00-3.5...........full speed (x1)

Filters 4-5................half speed (x2)
 

Huub

Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2007
Messages
250
Format
4x5 Format
It could also be the case that your friend has some realy old filters, used for the Multigrade II paper. Those came with a calculation disk, which you used to recalculate exposure times when you changed filers. When Ilford Multigrade III paper was introduced somewhere in the early '80 s, the filter system was upgraded to the current system, which ask for a doubling of the exposure time when going from grade 3.5 to grade 4. When you still use those very old filters it could be an idea to upgrade to the newer system, also because the old filters are most likely to have faded in one way or another or contain other damages.
 
Last edited:
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…