Film Stocks with a Classic Vintage Look (like Agfa/Adox)?

On The Mound

A
On The Mound

  • 2
  • 1
  • 40
On The Mound

A
On The Mound

  • 0
  • 1
  • 35
On The Mound

A
On The Mound

  • 0
  • 0
  • 33
elrossio01.jpg

A
elrossio01.jpg

  • 9
  • 0
  • 85
sad roses

A
sad roses

  • 4
  • 1
  • 82

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,453
Messages
2,775,143
Members
99,619
Latest member
sc0rnd
Recent bookmarks
0

donetskiy

Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2025
Messages
12
Location
Garmany
Format
Analog
Most of the cameras I’m handling are 35mm or 120 — curious: what’s your favorite modern film stock that gives a vintage look similar to early Agfa or Adox films?
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,828
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
I'd have thought that on the "continuous improvement" path that film makers have seemed to have followed there would be none that resemble much older or "vintage" film

I suppose in the Ilford line-up the current Pan F may not have changed much if any since it was launched many years ago and based on it being stilled called Pan F my assumption is that it may be the same or close to the same Pan F when it was launched

I suppose the recent launch of ortho films might hark back to what you describe as the vintage look but this is an assumption on my part as I don't know much about what you regard as the vintage look

So can you describe what you regard as vintage or maybe all you are looking for is our opinion on what each of us regard as modern film with vintage looks

While I am pretty vintage my photography did not start in that era 🙂

pentaxuser
 
OP
OP
donetskiy

donetskiy

Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2025
Messages
12
Location
Garmany
Format
Analog
Thank you!
I'd have thought that on the "continuous improvement" path that film makers have seemed to have followed there would be none that resemble much older or "vintage" film

I suppose in the Ilford line-up the current Pan F may not have changed much if any since it was launched many years ago and based on it being stilled called Pan F my assumption is that it may be the same or close to the same Pan F when it was launched

I suppose the recent launch of ortho films might hark back to what you describe as the vintage look but this is an assumption on my part as I don't know much about what you regard as the vintage look

So can you describe what you regard as vintage or maybe all you are looking for is our opinion on what each of us regard as modern film with vintage looks

While I am pretty vintage my photography did not start in that era 🙂

pentaxuser
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,631
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
Foma action pan 400. I also think Trix 320 is a fairly old emulsion, when Kodak last updated Trix 400 not sure if they updated 320. Then Delta or Tmax 3200 shot at 1600 or 3200 will have grain.
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,255
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
The "Look" is largely down to your interpretation in printing or post scanning, apart from Spectral response.

If by Adox you mean the old rebadged EFKE films then the Kb.R/Pl 25 was an amazing film, LF quality from 35mm negatives.

I've not been shooting Agfa and Adox/EFKE films very long, only 40 or 50 years, but I would not call them "Vintage look".

Ian
 

abruzzi

Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2018
Messages
3,030
Location
New Mexico, USA
Format
Large Format
for an old look, you might try an orthochromatic film (not red sensitive) like Foma Ortho 400, Ilford Ortho, or Ferrania Ortho (if you can find any.) It will be especially noricable on faces, especially people with freckled skin.
 

JPD

Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2007
Messages
2,154
Location
Sweden
Format
Medium Format
I have tried many different films and been surprised that even modern films can look "timeless" depending on the subject, my own mood, lighting, and probably many more small things. Films can have somewhat different spectral response, but lighting and weather will also affect how they look.
 

GregY

Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Messages
3,176
Location
Alberta
Format
Large Format
The look depends on the printing as well.
Using Foma 131 results in a vintage look
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,628
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
If you compose and light a photo in a vintage manner, the results from most modern films will look vintage.
More important, make the sort of printing/post processing choices that were made in vintage times.
People tended to use more exposure with older films than what is recommended now, so for the same format, there was more grain and marginally more shadow detail, at the expense of highlight rendition.
So exposure can factor in as well.
As some of the more modern films are much finer grained, and even the more traditional style films are a bit finer grained, if you want to emulate vintage levels of grain with more modern films you may need to consider adjusting exposure and development to add some.
 

AZD

Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2021
Messages
314
Location
SLC, UT
Format
35mm
The look depends on the printing as well.
Using Foma 131 results in a vintage look

Yep. I recently purchased a box and have made a few test prints of the same negative on 131 and some other papers. It definitely looks “vintage”, or whatever we mean when we say that, compared to, say, MGRC glossy, which is about as modern as silver gelatin paper gets.

Short version: the final print or presentation will have a lot to do with how the image “feels”.

As for films though, most are pretty modern in specifications and manufacturing. I have a small stash of Efke 25, it really was something unique. CHS 100 II has some shared lineage with Efke, but more grain for certain. I think FP4 can look about as vintage as anything current. Very responsive to processing, rather forgiving in exposure.

As Matt just mentioned, exposure and processing play a role. I have many of my grandfather’s negatives going back to the early 1950s, maybe even a few older ones. They were exposed well and are developed to a higher contrast than would be typical today. I know they are mostly Kodak and suspect the earliest are Verichrome (ortho, not pan) based on typed notes and age of known subjects. Most print quite easily given the high contrast. Do they look vintage? I guess so, 75 years later.
 

blee1996

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
1,195
Location
SF Bay Area, California
Format
Multi Format
I think film is still playing a larger part than lenses. For vintage look but fresh stock, I like Fomapan 100/400, Double-X, PanF 50.

On the other hand, I have plenty of long expired Plus-X and Verichrome Pan that will give the authentic old school look.
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,631
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
Thinking about it, as noted by blee1996, Eastman Double XX movie film. I think the emulsion goes back a ways, maybe to the 70s. Has some grain, resolution is similar to PluX 125 at 100LPMM when used at still film. D76 1:1, DDX, or Rodinal to bring out the grain.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom