Film Notches

Woman wearing shades.

Woman wearing shades.

  • 0
  • 0
  • 12
Curved Wall

A
Curved Wall

  • 4
  • 0
  • 63
Crossing beams

A
Crossing beams

  • 9
  • 1
  • 88
Shadow 2

A
Shadow 2

  • 4
  • 0
  • 63
Shadow 1

A
Shadow 1

  • 3
  • 0
  • 60

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,837
Messages
2,781,638
Members
99,723
Latest member
bookchair
Recent bookmarks
0

Mahler_one

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2002
Messages
1,155
I hate to bother people here. However, I have done goggle searches, and checked sheet film notch codes and I still can't figure out which film is in some holders that I purchased with a camera a few years back. There are 3 sharp "V"s punched out without any other markings. I believe the film is color, but I am not sure which one. Thanks for any help.

Ed
 

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,832
Format
Hybrid
hi ed

doesn't sound like color film, but tri x ...--v-v-v------

good luck!

john
 
OP
OP

Mahler_one

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2002
Messages
1,155
John, I looked at that code, but note that TriX has a "u" to the right of the three v's, and the film I have simply has the v-v-v-. TriX appears to be, v-v-v- U ( obviously not a "U" but you get the idea I think...

Thanks.

Ed
 

Bruce Watson

Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2005
Messages
497
Location
Central NC
Format
4x5 Format
If it's three "V"s, it's Tri-X. I went through dozens of boxes of 5x4 TXT-4164, and that's the notch code for that film. I suspect that the three "V"s plus the "U" is the newer (current) version of Tri-X.

Kodak has a history of changing notch codes when they make a major change to the emulsion. The referenced Kodak Tech. Pub. on notch codes doesn't have the current notch code for TMY-2, which is a single "V" by itself. I'm just sayin'...
 

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,832
Format
Hybrid
hi mahler one

like bruce said ...
the older tri x emulsion was just -v-v-v---

have fun!
john
 
OP
OP

Mahler_one

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2002
Messages
1,155
Thanks to all...yes, after doing some more digging around with goggle, I have discovered that Kodak DOES change their notch codes. I had to go to a previous Darkroom Datiguide to get the information...what a great resource the APUG really is.

Bruce...I'm probably not going to use this film ( not sure it's available in 5x7 ), but I did want to take a few photographs to get used to handling a 5x7 back on a Deardorff. I use the BTZS method with a Jobo expert tank at 75 degrees, DDX 1:9. Do you have any suggestions for a developing time...just intend to do a few sheets, but would be nice to be reasonably close without going through film curves, etc. Just standard SBR of 7 should be adequate.


Ed
 

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,832
Format
Hybrid
glad i could help ed!

i use old outdated film, i hate to admit i didn't know what
the notch codes to tri x or tmx or tmy were post 2001 :smile:

i don't use your ddx or btzs methods
just sheets shuffled in trays .. and i usually over expose by 1 stop and over-develop (by inspection) ...
if you can sacrifice a few sheets and over process by 15 % to start with ...
that is what i originally did ... you will probably be happy ... 5x7 sheets of tri x make beautiful negatives!
 

Bruce Watson

Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2005
Messages
497
Location
Central NC
Format
4x5 Format
Bruce...I'm probably not going to use this film ( not sure it's available in 5x7 ), but I did want to take a few photographs to get used to handling a 5x7 back on a Deardorff. I use the BTZS method with a Jobo expert tank at 75 degrees, DDX 1:9. Do you have any suggestions for a developing time...just intend to do a few sheets, but would be nice to be reasonably close without going through film curves, etc. Just standard SBR of 7 should be adequate.

I'd give it to you if I could, but I've never used DDX. Given that DDX is a phenidone-hydroquinone developer, and Tri-X is a long-toe film, you might want to drop down from ISO 320, maybe to an EI of 250 or 200. That should give you good odds of getting enough exposure to get good shadow detail. Then you might want to develop to the suggested times in the Dead Link Removed It won't be spot on (might be a little long resulting in a little bit more contrast than optimum given the extra bit of exposure), but it won't be totally off either. Certainly good enough for testing purposes. And if you develop one sheet at a time you can make time adjustments as you go.

Alternatively the Massive Development Chart might have reasonable development times for this combination.

I note that neither of these sources quote for 1+9; they only list 1+4.
 
OP
OP

Mahler_one

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2002
Messages
1,155
Ah Bruce...develop by inspection! I just was at a Michael and Paul work-shop where developing by inspection was demonstrated. Are you using Pyro and a green safe light?

And thanks to you and John for the developing suggestions! That long toe might come in handy if one want to use Azo and Amidol, and the higher contrast as well!

Ed
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom