I believe Ferrania has one big thing that other businesses do not have and that is going to boost their E-6 sales as well: promise of commitment to film and the kind of "from film user to film user". Even if their chrome isn't as good as Fuji's many are going to buy from them. The movement to build a film factory "for the next 100 years" might even bring some new people to shoot color reversal. After all, now it's a "new thing" and for many people it really could be that they haven't shot slide film.
Not to mention that for color reversal motion picture film users there are no real options left. As for the number of those people, it has been interesting to note that there are people who say that they haven't ever shot super-8 or 16mm but now might try it.
It's almost like a revival sort of thing, brought about by new hope and enthusiasm.
but personally for me, i dont feel that shooting digital is alot different than most C41 print films (with the exception of portra and ektar perhaps)
"Most C41 print films with the exception of Portra and Ektar???"
Ok, ok, Fuji makes Pro 400H and both Fuji and Kodak make consumer films, but I haven't shot any (newly made) color neg EXCEPT Portra or Ektar in many, many years - probably not since the 90s. I haven't shot any since getting back into photography in 2010. Oh, there was some frozen Optima 100 and Superia 120 in a batch of film I got off eBay and I shot it, and it works fine in spite of age (always frozen) but I've only bought Portra and Ektar as fresh film. They are pretty much are THE C41 films now.
On the other topics, it's sad to me how quickly people forget. A friend in her early 40s asked if I'd be making tintypes (well, not opposed to it, but that's what she thought as soon as I said film.) Even people plenty old enough to remember film seem to think it's gone and in some cases to have almost forgotten about it.
I certainly remember Super 8, but in this case I'm more on the other side of the fence. Given the low quality of that tiny frame and the cost of the films currently available I don't see any reason I'd want to get into that unless a) for a lark, AND b) the price of film came down a LOT. The current B&W films are cost prohibitive AND the quality is poor. It's an interesting flash back to yesteryear and I'm glad some people do it, ESPECIALLY if it means FF start making E6, but I admit to kind of scratching my head over the appeal.
To answer your question #3, they do have access to the recipes to make the emulsions.
How does the sprocket holes affect price? All film has them, 35mm has even larger ones.
Ferrania have publicly stated that not only is their first product to be an ISO100 E-6 film, they also hope to follow that up within the first year of production with both a second ISO400 E-6 and a third ISO800-3200 E-6 films. This is undoubtedly a multimillion USD/GBP/EUR operation.
Why would they knowingly go down such a road if there was no market for E-6?
How does the sprocket holes affect price? All film has them, 35mm has even larger ones.
I thought the price would be affected by the total area of the film itself?
you have to put them in. That takes a machine that punches 4 to 6 holes at a time, advances the film, and punches 4-6 more holes.
Did y'all forget sharpness? How about dye stability? Reciprocity? Keeping on dealer shelves? They may re-engineer, but all of these have to be checked out and some take a year or more of tests such as image stability and raw stock keeping. This would mean that a salable coating would have had to been made at least a year ago for proper testing before going out to be sold.
PE
Stop cluttering up the thread with facts and manufacturing experience please Mr. M
Nobody should be expecting Fuji-like quality out of the gate.
As I said somewhere else, Scotty is initially going to be beaming us back to the photographic 70s regarding E-6. Now I exposed lots of transparency film back in the 70s and I recall enjoying that experience immensely. So there's no reason not to expect a similarly enjoyable experience today.
If one is looking only for ultra-smooth, ultra-clinical perfection, then film in general is likely not for you. Film photographers revel in different palettes, renditions, and appearances. If one desires only clinical, there are other mature technologies at one's disposal. Or one can simply step up in format. Grain at 35mm largely becomes a non-issue at 6x7.
Do not make the mistake of allowing the perfect to become the enemy of the good.
Ken
I assume you're being scarcastic, pdeeh...
I think if I were a slide film user and had got used to Fuji's resolution then while I might try Ferrania for a while, quality would draw me back to Fuji.
If Ferrania were the only slide film producer then maybe the "die-hards" would put up with the granularity but I suspect over the long term even they might graduate to colour neg
This then leaves the question of whether the hardcore slide film users would then represent a big enough market.
Certainly as long as Fuji make slide film then I feel Ferrania only has a very limited period to get the granularity down to Fuji levels.
pentaxuser
2005 rather then 70s?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?