Film for highlights

Gary Holliday

Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
824
Location
Belfast, UK
Format
Medium Format
I'm looking for a new film for portraiture. I don't have much time for testing, but I'm thinking of Pan F or Acros.

Looking for nice highlight detail and smoothness of skin tones.

Anyone have any any thoughts on these choices?

The dev will be Rodinal.

Cheers
 

Mark_S

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 20, 2004
Messages
563
Location
Portland, OR
Format
4x5 Format
I do mostly landscape photography, and I live in a part of the world which is covered in snow for half of the year, so holding detail in highlights is a key thing. I used to use Plus-X in the winter time because of the nice soft shoulder that it has, which allows you to hold detail in highlights. Alas, they have discontinued it in 4x5.
 

Mark_S

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 20, 2004
Messages
563
Location
Portland, OR
Format
4x5 Format
Gary - I should have added...

If you want a film to hold details in highlights, you want to look for a film which has a soft shoulder in it's characteristic curve. Both Pan F and Acros have relatively straight characteristic curves from the midtones through the highlights. Look at the curve for FP4+ for an example of a film which has the type of shoulder that I am talking about.
 

Ole

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 9, 2002
Messages
9,245
Location
Bergen, Norway
Format
Large Format
I've never used Acros, but I have used Pan F+. I switched back to FP4+, which gives me everything I'm looking for.
 

Thomas Bertilsson

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
15,708
Location
Switzerland
Format
Multi Format
I tried Pan-F a few times, but didn't see the point as I don't print 35mm any larger 5x7 anymore.
The times I've done portraiture, I've had best luck with higher speed films. I love Kodak Tri-X, especially with Pyrocat-HD as developer. My other favorites for this have been HP5, Agfa APX400. Lately I've been experimenting with Fuji Neopan 1600 and I'm very impressed by that as well. I love grain.
Acros is really really creamy, with extremely nice tonality across the board. I like it better than Pan-F, and it works really well with Rodinal.

I've attached a child portrait that is outside, Tri-X, FA-1027 developer, printed on Agfa MCC118 paper in VersaPrint II. Size 5x7.

My two cents.

- Thom
 

Attachments

  • Isaac01.jpg
    75.3 KB · Views: 286

jim appleyard

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 21, 2004
Messages
2,415
Format
Multi Format
Gary, will these be portraits of men or women? These "rules" are meant to be broken and your taste is entirely yours, but I like to do men with biting clarity. I would choose a slow film in a well-diluted accutance dev. I would also use medium or large format. Pyro devs can also help hold highlights.

For women, I would choose a fast film, say Tri-X or HP-5 in D-76 1+0. A faster film in a solvent dev will help hide facial flaws (we all have them!).

I did a portrait of a woman with Ilford's SFX, 35mm, developed in Rodinal. The extra grain of SFX and Rodinal gave the portrait a soft look, especially at 11x14. She told me it was the best photo of her ever taken. If I can dig out the neg, I'll scan it.
 

Pete H

Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2004
Messages
771
Location
Stavanger or
Format
Multi Format
Yes, HIE is also good for creamy skin tones if you don't mind the grain. I like Efke/Adox 25 for people too.
 
OP
OP

Gary Holliday

Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
824
Location
Belfast, UK
Format
Medium Format
Thomas Bertilsson said:
Acros is really really creamy, with extremely nice tonality across the board. I like it better than Pan-F, and it works really well with Rodinal.

- Thom
Click to expand...

These are the qualities I'm looking for.

I "shoot" (for those who love that phrase) women in 120. Quite diffused with softboxes. All very flattering.

I'm quite surprised by some of your choices folks; methods I wouldn't normally have considered. I'm also surprised that Rodinal works well with the new film types. But that's the magik alchemy of it all.

FP4 has never excited me over the years and I consider it a bit boring. I've been itching to try Acros since the early talk of its release in the 90s.
 

fhovie

Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2003
Messages
1,250
Location
Powell Wyoming
Format
Large Format
To control highlights, I would use a film that can suck up a lot of range - TRI-X - Expose it at 200 and develop it in Pyrocat-P - with the right development time and mix it is easy to get 10 stops -

The other option is to develop your film in a very conpensating developer - Split D-23 comes to mind - The developer will exhaust itself before it blows out the highlights. -

I would not stand process or push the film, and slow films usually have trouble with big a SBR - Pan F 50 can really give you runaway contrast if you are not careful!
 

catem

Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2006
Messages
1,358
Location
U.K.
Format
Multi Format
Gary,

I've only once used Acros for a 'person' picture. You can see it if interested in the small selection of work I put together before Christmas, on website below, (the one entitled 'Summer Dreams').

Using it was accidental really as it happened to be in my camera as I had been doing some still life (I love it for that). I had to underexpose it - according to the box speed - because of the conditions (available light, from 2 windows, summer evening, using mamiyaRZ handheld) but processed it normally - I was surprised at the detail in the shadows. (In fact having recalibrated my monitor with pro software at the weekend it looks slightly lighter than I thought or intended - should have done it before!) - the highlights are fine on the neg tho you may not be able to tell on the pic. Anyway I was pleased with the result.

I've decided I'm going to try it more for 'people'. I really do like it for still life, it gives great separation of tones & it works well rated @ 50
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Black Dog

Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2003
Messages
4,291
Location
Running up that hill
Format
Multi Format
I've tried ACROS with PMK and Dixactol and been very impressed-PMK will definitely keep hot highlights under control. A staining dev will also keep Pan F in order too.Hmmm.........time to do a Pan F/Adox 25/ACROS shootout I think!
 
OP
OP

Gary Holliday

Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
824
Location
Belfast, UK
Format
Medium Format
I made some contacts of the Acros film and they look great...very smooth. How does overexposure affect this film Neal?

Any ideas for squeezing some extra detail out of the highlights?
 

Robert T. McCarthy

Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Messages
23
Location
Caselton Cor
Format
Med. Format RF

/////////////////////////////////

I like D400 in X-tol, with Ilford MG.
Everything shines, perfect together.

Regards.

Bob Mccarthy
 

Rick Jones

Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2004
Messages
127
Location
Maryland
Format
Multi Format
While you don't mention what format you shoot if 120 or 4X5 are options the publication "Kodak Professional Black and White Films" suggests 320TX offers "extended toe curve characteristics especially suitable for studio use, with the expected gain in highlight separation so useful for commercial and professional subjects. These characteristics make the film popular for outdoor informal portraiture under low contrast and back lighting conditions usually used for this type of photography".
 

dynachrome

Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2006
Messages
1,788
Format
35mm
Good B&W Film For Highlights

If you are shooting in 35mm of 120 then I would recommend Plus-X. It has very lively highlights. I always liked Plus-X in vright light better than FP4+. In less contrasty light I think FP4+ is nicer. ACROS will give decent skin tones and will have very little grain unles it is boiled in Rodinal.
 

DrPablo

Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2006
Messages
814
Location
North Caroli
Format
Multi Format
I feel like Acros and Tmax 100 both produce a very cold 'metallic' look. Beautiful for architecture and machines, because the highlights almost look like a bright reflection. On the other hand they look too harsh for delicate and subtle highlights, like for clouds and skin. I love FP4+ and HP5+ for those, and I'd imagine TriX would be similar.
 
OP
OP

Gary Holliday

Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
824
Location
Belfast, UK
Format
Medium Format
I'm been looking at some online photos of Acros. Does it have a digital look??

I've had some nice results with C-41 film Jon, although commercial processing is time consuming and an unnecessary expense.

I will explore other developers to get the required look in the highlights...thinking of Prescysol.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Alan Johnson

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 16, 2004
Messages
3,308
These tabular grain films get some stick as plastic,metallic,digital etc. so as I am intending to do some 120 portraits on Delta 100 in Pyrocat HD here are counter debating points.First, a pro I know shoots his film portraiture on Delta 100 because his clients buy the smooth look.
Second, see the last post here:
http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=003NXy
Delta and Acros produce beautiful translucent skin tones when properly exposed.Since Prescysol is similar to Pyrocat HD,Acros in Precysol should be fine.
 

kiku

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 5, 2004
Messages
131
Location
Moorpark, Ca
Format
Multi Format
Thomas Bertilsson said:
I've attached a child portrait that is outside, Tri-X, FA-1027 developer, printed on Agfa MCC118 paper in VersaPrint II. Size 5x7.

My two cents.

- Thom
Click to expand...
Hi Thom: May I ask a couple of questions?

What ISO do you rate Tri-X?
For FA-1027, what dilution do you use and what development time?
Thanks, Howard Tanger
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…