I have always shot Kodak Plus-X, Tri-X or T-Max and developed in D-76.
My father was a photographer and he was always a "Kodak Man." Ever since I was a kid, film always came in little yellow boxes. All my photography teachers specified Tri-X or T-Max. This is just the way I was brought up.
I have been sitting here and thinking that I'd like to branch out and try something new. I just don't have experience with other films. I think I have shot Fuji film, maybe, once or twice but I honestly don't remember.
I have been reading up. I read good things about Legacy Pro. The price looks good. I've read about a few other films but it all seems complicated and preference based.
Right now, I am shooting mostly black and white and processing it at home. If I "need" color I take it to the photo store and have them do it. I'd say I'm 90%-10% in favor of B/W. I would like to develop color at home. I am sure I can do it. I have done it once or twice at school but the lab had all the equipment. I need to get better at hand developing before I try color film at home.
90% of my film will be scanned and displayed electronically. Many photos will be printed on my ink jet printer. Some photos may be taken to the photo store and printed traditionally or processed through a photo kiosk.
I would like to start making cyanotypes this summer if weather, time and finances are all with me. A long distance goal would be to set up a darkroom in my basement but that's not feasible at this time.
I have been considering whether to buy a bulk roll of Plus-X and a bulk roll of Tri-X and rolling my own at home but the prices I have seen on Legacy Pro are quite attractive. You can buy a 20-pack of Legacy Pro for less than half the price!
Of course I like fine grain. Who doesn't?But I also like nice bright highlights and good dark blacks with smooth contrast in between.
I have been using T-Max lately and, to be honest, I just haven't been feeling the love for it. Everything seems to have this slight gray patina, almost like looking through a sheer curtain. Who knows? Maybe I'm doing something wrong but I have had other people tell me the same thing about T-Max.
Which direction do you think I ought to go? That Legacy Pro looks mighty tasty and you can't beat that price.
Or, do you think I should get my sh** together and learn how to make use of Kodak films better?
Legacy Pro, is repackaged Neopan 400 film. And, a fantastic film. By far, my favorite of the 400 speed B/W films. Wonderful film. Very fine grained and wonderful tonality. Give it a try!
If it truly is, then shouldn't it be going away since a flurocarbon in the manufacturing process has been banned in Japan?
I have always shot Kodak Plus-X, Tri-X or T-Max and developed in D-76.
My father was a photographer and he was always a "Kodak Man." Ever since I was a kid, film always came in little yellow boxes. All my photography teachers specified Tri-X or T-Max. This is just the way I was brought up.
I have been sitting here and thinking that I'd like to branch out and try something new. I just don't have experience with other films. I think I have shot Fuji film, maybe, once or twice but I honestly don't remember.
I have been reading up. I read good things about Legacy Pro. The price looks good. I've read about a few other films but it all seems complicated and preference based.
Right now, I am shooting mostly black and white and processing it at home. If I "need" color I take it to the photo store and have them do it. I'd say I'm 90%-10% in favor of B/W. I would like to develop color at home. I am sure I can do it. I have done it once or twice at school but the lab had all the equipment. I need to get better at hand developing before I try color film at home.
90% of my film will be scanned and displayed electronically. Many photos will be printed on my ink jet printer. Some photos may be taken to the photo store and printed traditionally or processed through a photo kiosk.
I would like to start making cyanotypes this summer if weather, time and finances are all with me. A long distance goal would be to set up a darkroom in my basement but that's not feasible at this time.
I have been considering whether to buy a bulk roll of Plus-X and a bulk roll of Tri-X and rolling my own at home but the prices I have seen on Legacy Pro are quite attractive. You can buy a 20-pack of Legacy Pro for less than half the price!
Of course I like fine grain. Who doesn't?But I also like nice bright highlights and good dark blacks with smooth contrast in between.
I have been using T-Max lately and, to be honest, I just haven't been feeling the love for it. Everything seems to have this slight gray patina, almost like looking through a sheer curtain. Who knows? Maybe I'm doing something wrong but I have had other people tell me the same thing about T-Max.
Which direction do you think I ought to go? That Legacy Pro looks mighty tasty and you can't beat that price.
Or, do you think I should get my sh** together and learn how to make use of Kodak films better?
I agree with sperera. Fuji Acros 100 is wonderful - very fine grain and very nice tonal range. I have had success with TMAX developer.
I don't know anything of the flourocarbon process or it's supposed banning in Japan. I do know that they have no intention of discontinueing the production of this film in 35mm format.
Just an update for you...
I got a bulk roll of Legacy Pro 100, a roll of Legacy Pro 400 and a roll of Ilford Pan F+.
I just shot some of the Legacy 100 and some of the Pan F today. They just came out of the soup about an hour ago and they are still drying, downstairs as I write this. From what I can tell just from looking at the negative as I was hanging them up, they look pretty tasty!
I spent most of both rolls bracketing shots and taking pictures of things I have shot before for familiarity purposes. Just about everything came out as good as or even better than I expected.
The Legacy Pro, I shot at 100 ASA and developed in D-76 1:1 for 9-1/2 minutes.
The Pan F+, I shot at 50 ASA and developed in D-76 1:3 for 14-1/2 minutes.
Both of them seem to have shot well either at normal exposure or one stop under exposed. The shots that were one stop over were passable but not optimal. I shot a few that were two stops over just to see what happens. They did come out but were marginal.
In the past few months since I started shooting film again, I have grown accustomed to shooting one stop over exposed but, with these two films, I seems like my experiments are showing that I can use normal exposure or one stop under exposed almost all the time and they will come out just right.
The film is still drying so I have yet to scan some of the frames and print proof/contacts but preliminary results look good!
I get very consistent results with Delta 100 or FP4 in Xtol.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?